THRIPS SPECIES DIVERSITY IN COTTON ECOSYSTEM OF TAMIL NADU AND THEIR MANAGEMENT
189 / 172
Abstract
Comprehensive study on cotton thrips diversity in cotton ecosystem of Tamil Nadu was conducted based on the
collection and the random surveys undertaken by the Department of Cotton, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University. Three
species belonging to three genera in two families of Thysanoptera order were recorded in Coimbatore cotton
ecosystem.Phylogenetic analysis and diversity indices were completed to identify the species and their variation revealed
the maximum prevalence of Scirtothrips dorsalis (3.25) followed by Thripstabaci (1.34) and Thripspalmi(0.24) which
showed high diversity of thrips species in cotton ecosystem system and the importance of its management.The dominant
species of Scirtothrips dorsalis exhibited the tendency to be the most alarming key pest of cotton in Tamil Nadu. It might
be possible that the abundance and status of diversity of thrips population could be prominent and transimit the Tobacco
Streak Virus disease in cotton. Flonicomid 50 WG @ 75 g a.i. ha-1 has recorded significantly lowest reduction of thrips
population from 7.93 to 0.40 thrips / 3 leaves followed by acephate 75 SP @ 290 g a.i.ha-1 with a population reduction from
7.93 to 0.60 thrips per leaf.
References
1. Burris E., Ratchford, K. J., Pavloff, A. M., Boquet,
2. D. J., Williams, B. R and Rogers, R. L.
3. Thrips on seedling cotton: related
4. problems and control. Louisiana Agricultural
5. Experiment Station Bulletin, 811: 19. LSU
6. AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA.
7. Childers, C.C and Achor, D.S. 1995. Thrips feeding
8. and oviposition injuries to economoic
9. plants, subsequent damage, and host
10. responses to infestation. In: Thrips Biology
11. and Management, Parker, B. L.,Skinner, M
12. and Lewis, T. (Editors). Plenum Press, New
13. York.pp. 3151.
14. Childers, C.C. 1997. Feeding and ovioposition injuries
15. to plants. In: Thrips as Crop Pests, Lewis,
16. T. (Editor). CAB International, New York.pp.
17. -537.
18. Fedor, P., Malenovsky, I., Vanhara, J., Sierka, W
19. and Havel, J. 2008. Thrips (Thysanoptera)
20. identification using artificial neural networks.
21. Bulletin of Entomological Research. 98:
22. -447.
23. Fisher, R.A., Corbet, A.S and Williams, C.B. 1943.
24. The relation between the number of species
25. and the number of individuals in a random
26. sample of an animal population. Journal of
27. Animal Ecology.12: 42-58.
28. Henderson, C.F and Tilton, E.W. 1955. Tests with
29. acaricides against brown wheat mite.
30. Journal of Economic Entomology.48: 157-
31. Henderson, P.A. 2003. Practical Methods in Ecology.
32. Blackwell Publishers, United Kingdom. pp.
33. Khattak, M.K., Rashid, M., Hussain, S.A.S and
34. Islam, T. 2006. Comparative effect of neem
35. (Azadirachta indica) oil, neem seed water
36. extract and baythroid TM against whitefly,
37. jassids and thrips on cotton. Pakistan
38. Entomologist. 28(1): 21-23.
39. Kirk, W.D.J. 1995.Feeding behaviour and nutritional
40. requirements. In: Thrips Biology and
41. Management, Parker, B. L., Skinner, M and
42. Lewis, T (Editors). Plenum Press, New
43. York. pp. 2129.
44. Moritz, G., Subramanian, S., Brandt, S and
45. Triapitsyn,S.V. 2011. Development of a userfriendly
46. identification system for the native
47. and invasive pest thrips and their parasitoids
48. in East Africa. Phytopathology.101:59–60.
49. Reed, J.T. 1988. Western flower thrips in Mississippi
50. cotton: Identification, damage, and control.
51. Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry
52. Experiment Station Information Sheet. 1320:
53. Regupathy, A and Dhamu, K.P. 2001. Statistics Work
54. Book for Insecticide Toxicology. 2nd Edition,
55. Softech Publishers, Coimbatore. pp. 206.
56. THRIPS SPECIES DIVERISTY IN COTTON ECOSYSTEM OF TAMILNADU
57. Samota, R.G., Jat, B.L and Choudhary, M.D. 2017.
58. Efficacy of newer insecticides and
59. biopesticides against thrips, Scirtothrips
60. dorsalis Hood in chilli. Journal of
61. Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry.
62. (4):1458-1462.
63. Statista, 2018. Cotton World Markets and Trade:
64. United States, Department of Agriculture,
65. Foreign Agricultural Service. Retrieved from
66. website (https://www.statista.com/
67. statistics/ 263055/ cotton-productionworldwide-
68. by-top-countries/ ) on 11.12.2018
69. Telford, A.D and Hopkins, L. 1957. Arizona cotton
70. insects. Arizona Agricultural Experiment
71. Station Bulletin, 286. University of Arizona,
72. Tucson, AZ.
73. Wilson, L.J., Sadras, V.O and Bauer, L. 1994. Effects
74. of thrips on growth, maturity and yield of
75. cotton - Preliminary results. In: Proceedings
76. of the Seventh Australian Cotton
77. Conference, 10th-12th August, 1994,
78. Broadbeach, Australia. Australian Cotton
79. Growers Research Association, Wee Waa,
80. NSW, Australia.pp. 113-120.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.