THRIPS SPECIES DIVERSITY IN COTTON ECOSYSTEM OF TAMIL NADU AND THEIR MANAGEMENT


189 / 172

Authors

  • K. SENGUTTUVAN* Department of Cotton, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore- 641 003

Abstract

Comprehensive study on cotton thrips diversity in cotton ecosystem of Tamil Nadu was conducted based on the
collection and the random surveys undertaken by the Department of Cotton, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University. Three
species belonging to three genera in two families of Thysanoptera order were recorded in Coimbatore cotton
ecosystem.Phylogenetic analysis and diversity indices were completed to identify the species and their variation revealed
the maximum prevalence of Scirtothrips dorsalis (3.25) followed by Thripstabaci (1.34) and Thripspalmi(0.24) which
showed high diversity of thrips species in cotton ecosystem system and the importance of its management.The dominant
species of Scirtothrips dorsalis exhibited the tendency to be the most alarming key pest of cotton in Tamil Nadu. It might
be possible that the abundance and status of diversity of thrips population could be prominent and transimit the Tobacco
Streak Virus disease in cotton. Flonicomid 50 WG @ 75 g a.i. ha-1 has recorded significantly lowest reduction of thrips
population from 7.93 to 0.40 thrips / 3 leaves followed by acephate 75 SP @ 290 g a.i.ha-1 with a population reduction from
7.93 to 0.60 thrips per leaf.

References

1. Burris E., Ratchford, K. J., Pavloff, A. M., Boquet,

2. D. J., Williams, B. R and Rogers, R. L.

3. Thrips on seedling cotton: related

4. problems and control. Louisiana Agricultural

5. Experiment Station Bulletin, 811: 19. LSU

6. AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA.

7. Childers, C.C and Achor, D.S. 1995. Thrips feeding

8. and oviposition injuries to economoic

9. plants, subsequent damage, and host

10. responses to infestation. In: Thrips Biology

11. and Management, Parker, B. L.,Skinner, M

12. and Lewis, T. (Editors). Plenum Press, New

13. York.pp. 3151.

14. Childers, C.C. 1997. Feeding and ovioposition injuries

15. to plants. In: Thrips as Crop Pests, Lewis,

16. T. (Editor). CAB International, New York.pp.

17. -537.

18. Fedor, P., Malenovsky, I., Vanhara, J., Sierka, W

19. and Havel, J. 2008. Thrips (Thysanoptera)

20. identification using artificial neural networks.

21. Bulletin of Entomological Research. 98:

22. -447.

23. Fisher, R.A., Corbet, A.S and Williams, C.B. 1943.

24. The relation between the number of species

25. and the number of individuals in a random

26. sample of an animal population. Journal of

27. Animal Ecology.12: 42-58.

28. Henderson, C.F and Tilton, E.W. 1955. Tests with

29. acaricides against brown wheat mite.

30. Journal of Economic Entomology.48: 157-

31. Henderson, P.A. 2003. Practical Methods in Ecology.

32. Blackwell Publishers, United Kingdom. pp.

33. Khattak, M.K., Rashid, M., Hussain, S.A.S and

34. Islam, T. 2006. Comparative effect of neem

35. (Azadirachta indica) oil, neem seed water

36. extract and baythroid TM against whitefly,

37. jassids and thrips on cotton. Pakistan

38. Entomologist. 28(1): 21-23.

39. Kirk, W.D.J. 1995.Feeding behaviour and nutritional

40. requirements. In: Thrips Biology and

41. Management, Parker, B. L., Skinner, M and

42. Lewis, T (Editors). Plenum Press, New

43. York. pp. 2129.

44. Moritz, G., Subramanian, S., Brandt, S and

45. Triapitsyn,S.V. 2011. Development of a userfriendly

46. identification system for the native

47. and invasive pest thrips and their parasitoids

48. in East Africa. Phytopathology.101:59–60.

49. Reed, J.T. 1988. Western flower thrips in Mississippi

50. cotton: Identification, damage, and control.

51. Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry

52. Experiment Station Information Sheet. 1320:

53. Regupathy, A and Dhamu, K.P. 2001. Statistics Work

54. Book for Insecticide Toxicology. 2nd Edition,

55. Softech Publishers, Coimbatore. pp. 206.

56. THRIPS SPECIES DIVERISTY IN COTTON ECOSYSTEM OF TAMILNADU

57. Samota, R.G., Jat, B.L and Choudhary, M.D. 2017.

58. Efficacy of newer insecticides and

59. biopesticides against thrips, Scirtothrips

60. dorsalis Hood in chilli. Journal of

61. Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry.

62. (4):1458-1462.

63. Statista, 2018. Cotton World Markets and Trade:

64. United States, Department of Agriculture,

65. Foreign Agricultural Service. Retrieved from

66. website (https://www.statista.com/

67. statistics/ 263055/ cotton-productionworldwide-

68. by-top-countries/ ) on 11.12.2018

69. Telford, A.D and Hopkins, L. 1957. Arizona cotton

70. insects. Arizona Agricultural Experiment

71. Station Bulletin, 286. University of Arizona,

72. Tucson, AZ.

73. Wilson, L.J., Sadras, V.O and Bauer, L. 1994. Effects

74. of thrips on growth, maturity and yield of

75. cotton - Preliminary results. In: Proceedings

76. of the Seventh Australian Cotton

77. Conference, 10th-12th August, 1994,

78. Broadbeach, Australia. Australian Cotton

79. Growers Research Association, Wee Waa,

80. NSW, Australia.pp. 113-120.

Downloads

Published

31-03-2019

How to Cite

K. SENGUTTUVAN*. (2019). THRIPS SPECIES DIVERSITY IN COTTON ECOSYSTEM OF TAMIL NADU AND THEIR MANAGEMENT. The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 47(1), 22-26. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/TJRA/article/view/133774