IMPACT OF MGNREGA IN TERMS OF DIRECT CHANGES- A STUDY IN SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
264 / 66
Abstract
The study examined the impact of MGNREGA in terms of direct changes experienced by the beneficiaries during the year 2015. One hundred and twenty(120) respondents were selected randomly for the study. The results revealed that majority of the MGNREGA beneficiaries’ experienced medium direct changes followed by high and low direct changes. Direct changes observed due to implementation of MGNREGA were increased employment generation (286 days/ year), increased number of employed persons in the family (3 or more), increased daily working hours (> 7 hours), increased daily wage rates (360/- Rs.), increased income generation, increased community and individual assets creation and reduced migration (47 days/ year)
References
1. Adeppa, D. 2014. Implementation and impact of
2. MGNREGA: A Study in Anantapuram
3. district of Andhra Pradesh. Galaxy:
4. International Multidisciplinary Research
5. Journal. 3 (2): 1-17.
6. Ahuja,U.R., Tyagi, D., Chauhan, S and Chaudary,
7. K.R.2011. Impact of MGNREGA on rural
8. employmet and migration: A study in
9. agriculturally- backward and agriculturally
10. -advanced districts of Haryana. Agricultural
11. Economics Research Review.24:495-502.
12. Argade, S.D. 2010. A Study on National Rural
13. Employment Gaurantee Scheme in Thane
14. district of Maharashtra. M. Sc. Thesis
15. submitted to Acharya N G Ranga
16. Agricultural University, Hyderabad.
17. Chhabra, S and Sharma, G.L. 2010. National rural
18. employment guarantee scheme (NREGS):
19. Realities and challenges. LBS Journal of
20. Management and Research. 2 (6): 64-72.
21. Dadabahu, A.S and Gopikrishna,T. 2013. Sustainable
22. rural livelihoods for small and marginal
23. farmers through employment generation in
24. Maharashtra.International Journal of
25. Scientific Research. 2 (5): 581-583.
26. Deepak, S and Mohanty, S. 2009. Implementation
27. of NREGA during eleventh plan in
28. Maharashtra- Experience, challenges and
29. ways forward. Indian Journal of Agricultural
30. Economics. 65 (3): 540-551.
31. Jeyshree, P., Subramanian, K., Murali, N and Peter,
32. M.J. 2010.Economic analysis of Mahatma
33. Gandhi NREGS - A study. Southern
34. Economist. 49: 13-16.
35. Kantharaju, C.N. 2011. Impact of MGNREGA on
36. employment generation and assets
37. creation in Tumkur district of Karnataka
38. state. M.Sc. Thesis submitted to University
39. of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru.
40. Naidu, G.V., Gopal, T and Nagabhushan. 2010.
41. Impact of MGNREGA on the living condition
42. of rural poor. Southern Economist. 49: 17-
43. Pyditalli, D.2015.Implementation of MGNREGA and
44. performance in Srikakulam district.
45. International Journal of Multidisciplinary
46. Advanced Research Trends.2(1):2015.
47. pp.62-67.
48. Ramesh, G and Krishnakumar, T. 2009. A study in
49. Karimnagar district of Andhra Pradesh
50. (MGNREGA). Kurukshetra. 58 (2): 29-30.
51. Sitarambabu, V., Rao, D.V.S., Reddy, G.R.,
52. Vijayabhinandana, B and Rao, V.S.
53. Socio-economic impact analysis of
54. Mahatma Gandhi National Rural
55. Employment Guarantee Scheme in Andhra
56. Pradesh.International Journal of
57. Development Research. 3 (10): 76-86.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.