RESPONSE OF RABI PIGEONPEA (Cajanas cajan (L.) Millsp) TO SOWING TIME AND IRRIGATIONS
240 / 15
Authors
-
P. VENKATA RAO
Regional Agricultural Research Station, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Lam, Guntur - 522034
Abstract
A field experiment was conducted to study the impact of sowing time and supplemental irrigations on growth and yield of rabi pigeonpea at Regional Agricultural Research Station, Lam, Guntur. The results indicated that the response to supplemental irrigation was more when three irrigations were provided than that of two or one at critical growth stages of pigeonpea with respect to growth and yield components. The first fortnight of September is identified as an optimum time of sowing during post-rainy season with provision of three supplemental irrigations at critical growth stages. The highest grain yield (1973 kg ha-1) was recorded with this combination and it also gave higher net returns (Rs.73,861/-) and B:C ratio (1.29).
References
1. Basu, T.K and Bandyopadhyay, S.R. 2009.
2. Productivity of rabi pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan
3. L. Millsp.) as influenced by scheduling of
4. irrigation. Journal of Crop and Weed. 5(2):90-
5. FAOSTAT, 2013. Food and Agricultural Organization
6. (FAO). Bulletin of Statistics. Retreived from
7. website http://faostat.fao.org on 05.9.2016.
8. Govind Reddy, M., Ghosh, B.C and Sudhakar, N.
9. Studies on scheduling of irrigation to
10. winter pigeonpea. Indian Journal of Agronomy.
11. (1):109-111.
12. Islam,S., Nanda,M.K and Mukhergee, A.K.2008.
13. Effect of date of sowing and spacing on growth
14. and yield of rabi pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.)
15. Millsp.). Journal of Crop and Weed. 4(1): 7-9.
16. Krishna Reddy,G., Maheshwara Reddy,P., Lavanya
17. Kumari, P and Giridhara Krishna, T.2015.
18. Response of pigeonpea varieties to time of
19. sowing during rabi season. Journal of
20. Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences.8 (2):12-
21. Kumbhar,N.M., Patel, J.S.,Gediya, K.M.,
22. Suryawanshi, P.K and Patel, C.J. 2015.
23. Influence of irrigation scheduling (IW: CPE
24. ratios) and sulphur on yield, quality and
25. economics of rabi pigeonpea (Cajanua cajan
26. L.). Legume Research.38 (5): 643-645.
27. RESPONSE OF RABI PIGEONPEA TO SOWING TIME AND IRRIGATIONS
28. Laxminarayana, P. 2003. Response of rabi redgram
29. to dates of sowing and row spacings. Annals
30. of Agricultural Research. New series. 24(1):
31. -189.
32. Nene, Y. L and Sheila, V. K. 1990. Pigeonpea:
33. geography and importance. In: The Pigeonpea.
34. Nene, Y. L., Hall, S.H. and Sheila, V. K. (Eds).
35. CAB International, Wellingford, U.K. pp.1-14.
36. Panse, A.M and Jana, P.K. 1990. Effect of dates of
37. sowing and growth patterns of pigeonpea
38. (Cajanas cajan (L.) Millsp) in winter season.
39. Madras Agricultural Journal. 77 (5 & 6): 208-
40. Pramod, G., Pujari, B.T., Basavaraja, M.K., Vijay
41. Mahantesh and Venkate Gowda. 2010. Yield,
42. yield parameters and economics of pigeonpea
43. (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp) as influenced by
44. genotypes, planting geometry and protective
45. irrigation. International Journal of Agricultural
46. Sciences. 6 (2): 422-425.
47. Saritha K.S., Pujari, B.T., Basavarajappa, R., Naik,
48. M.K., Ramesh Babu and Desai , B.K.2012.
49. Effect of irrigation, nutrient and planting
50. geometry on yield, yield attributes and
51. economics of pigeonpea. Karnataka Journal
52. of Agricultural Sciences. 25(1):131-133.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
