SUPPLEMENTATION OF NITROGEN AND POTASSIUM NUTRIENTS THROUGH FOLIAR NUTRITION TO BIDI TOBACCO (Nicotiana tabacum L.)
287 / 26
Abstract
Field experiment was conducted for two kharif seasons (2014 – 15 and 2015 – 16) at Regional Agricultural Research Station, Nandyal to study the response of bidi tobacco to supplemental nitrogen (N) and potassium (K) nutrients through foliar application. The treatments consisted of ten treatment combinations from three sources of nutrients (i.e. potassium nitrate (KNO3), ammonium sulphate + sulphate of potash and urea + sulphate of potash) and three intervals of foliar sprays at 45 days after sowing (DAT), 60 DAT, 45 and 60 DAT. The experiment was laid out in a RBD design and replicated thrice. Foliar nutrition of 2.5% potassium nitrate twice at 45 and 60 DAT recorded significantly higher cured leaf yield (1783 kg ha-1) but at par with foliar nutrition of 2.5% Ammonium sulphate + sulphate of potash twice at 45 and 60 DAT (1743 kg ha-1). Control treatment (without foliar nutrition) recorded significantly lower cured leaf yield of 1520 kg ha-1. Foliar nutrition of N and K recorded positive effect on content of nitrogen and potassium in cured leaf. The quality parameters viz., nicotine, reducing sugars and chlorides in cured leaf were not altered by the foliar nutrition of N and K compared to control. However, higher net returns were recorded with foliar nutrition of 2.5% ammonium sulphate + sulphate of potash twice at 45 and 60 DAT (Rs. 80169/- per ha) followed by application of 2.5% potassium nitrate (KNO3) (Rs. 69645/- ha-1) whereas without foliar spray treatment recorded the lowest net returns of Rs. 67550/- ha-1.
References
1. Damodar Reddy, D. 2014. Annual Report. All India
2. Net Work Project Central Tobacco Research
3. Institute, Rajahmundry. pp. 221-224.
4. Damodar Reddy, D. 2015. Annual Report. All India
5. Net Work Project. Central Tobacco Reseacrh
6. Insitute, Rajahmundry. pp173-174.
7. Doring, H .W and Gericke, R.1986. The efficiency of
8. foliar fertilization in arid and semiarid regions.
9. In: Foliar fertilization. A. Alexander (Ed.).
10. Kluwer Academy Publishers. Dordrecht, The
11. Netherlands. pp. 2935.
12. Govindan, K and Thirumurugan,V. 2000. Response
13. of green gram to foliar nutrition of potassium.
14. Journal of Maharashtra Agricultural
15. Universities. 25:302-303.
16. Jayarani Reddy, P.K., Narasimha Rao, L., Narasimha
17. Rao, C.L and Mahalakshmi, B.K. 2004. Effect
18. of different chemicals on growth, yield and yield
19. attributes of pigeonpea in vertisol. Annals of
20. Plant Physiology. 17(2): 120-124.
21. Lakshminarayana, R. 1990. New avenues for tobacco
22. export. The Hindu- Survey of Indian Agriculture.
23. pp.89.
24. Marchand, M. 2010. Effect of potassium on the
25. production and quality of tobacco leaves
26. International Potash Institute Research
27. Findings. e-ifc No. 24, September 2010.
28. Steve Curley, C.P. 1994. Foliar nutrition. Midwest
29. Laboratories, Inc. Omaha, NE 68144. pp.6.
30. Tukey, H. B and Marczyñski, S. 1984. Foliar nutrition
31. old ideas rediscovered. Acta Horticulture. 145:
32. -212.
33. Wójcik, P. 2004. Uptake of mineral nutrients from
34. foliar Fertilization (review) Journal of Fruit and
35. Ornamental Plant Research. 218 Special
36. Edition. Vol. 12: 201-218.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.