DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF NOVEL DIABETES NUTRITION EDUCATION TOOLKIT TAILORED FOR MIZO ADULTS


485 / 97

Authors

  • MALSAWMKIMI HAUHNAR Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Avinashillingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women, Coimbatore- 641 043
  • A. THIRUMANI DEVI Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Avinashillingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women, Coimbatore- 641 043
  • VANLALHRUAII Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Avinashillingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women, Coimbatore- 641 043

https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2024.52.1.08

Keywords:

Culture, Diabetes nutrition education, Health literacy, Interactive tool kit

Abstract

The study aimed to develop and evaluate a Diabetes Nutrition Education Toolkit tailored for Mizo adults to be used interactively between patients and dietitians. The Diabetes Nutrition Education Toolkit was developed between September 2022 and February 2023. It consisted of seven interactive nutrition education modules that provided practical tools to improve diet adherence. The appropriateness of the toolkit was evaluated by the “Suitability of Assessment of Materials (SAM)” by two independent raters. The readability grade level was assessed by the average readability score of
seven online tools, with each module rated “superior. The SAM score for each module was rated “superior” (93.5–100%) having a mean score of 97.46%. Cohen’s kappa statistically tested inter-rater reliability, and the strength of agreement varied between “substantial” and “almost perfect.” The Diabetes Nutrition Education Toolkit is suitable for the intended population and can be used as digital or printed material to supplement diabetes nutrition therapy.

References

1. Alonso, J. L., Cockx, L and Swinnen, J. F. 2018.

2. Culture and food security. Global Food

3. Security.17: 113–127.

4. American Diabetes Association.2019. Lifestyle

5. management: Standards of medical care

6. in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 42 (1): S46–

7. S60.

8. Davies, M. J., D’Alessio, D. A., Fradkin, J. E.,

9. Kernan, W. N., Mathieu, C., Mingrone, G.,

10. Rossing, P., Tsapas, A., Wexler, D. Jand

11. Buse, J. B. 2018. Management of

12. hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes. A

13. consensus report by the American

14. Diabetes Association (ADA) and the

15. European Association for the Study of

16. Diabetes(EASD). Diabetes Care. 41(12):

17. –2701.

18. Evert, A. B., Dennison, M., Gardner, C. D.,

19. Garvey, W. T., Lau, K. H. K., MacLeod,

20. J., Mitri, J., Pereira, R. F., Rawlings, K.,

21. Robinson, S., Saslow, L.,Uelmen, S.,

22. Urbanski, P. B and Yancy, W. S. 2019.

23. Nutrition therapy for adults with diabetes

24. Malsawmkimi Hauhnar et al.

25. or prediabetes: A consensus

26. report. Diabetes Care. 42(5): 731–754.

27. Kim S, Song Y, Park J and Utz S.2020. Patients

28. experiences of diabetes selfmanagement

29. education according to

30. health-literacy levels. Clinical Nursing

31. Research.29(5): 285-292.

32. Lalrohlui, F., Ghatak, S., Zohmingthanga, J.,

33. Hruaii, V and Kumar, N. S. 2021.

34. Fermented pork fat (Sa-um) and lifestyle

35. risk factors as potential indicators for

36. type 2 diabetes among the Mizo

37. population, North-east India. Journal of

38. Heath, Population and Nutrition.40(1):

39. Liu C, Wang D, Liu C, Jiang J, Wang X, Chen

40. H, Ju X, Zhang X.2020. What is the

41. meaning of health literacy? A systematic

42. review and qualitative synthesis. Family

43. Medicineand Community Health.

44. (2):e000351.

45. Nutbeam D and Lloyd J. E.2021.

46. Understanding and responding to health

47. literacy as a social determinant of health.

48. Annual Review Public Health. 1(42): 159-

49. Schubbe, D., Scalia, P., Yen, R.W., Saunders,

50. C. L., Cohen, S. S., Elwyn, G., Van Den

51. Muijsenbergh, M and Durand, M. 2020.

52. Using pictures to convey health

53. information: A systematic review and

54. meta-analysis of the effects on the

55. patient and consumer health behaviours

56. and outcomes. Patient Education and

57. Counselling. 103(10): 1935–1960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2987470

58. Soroya, S. H., Farooq, A., Mahmood, K.,

59. Isoaho, Jand Zara, S. 2021. From

60. information seeking to information

61. avoidance: Understanding the health

62. information behaviour during a global

63. health crisis. Information Processing and

64. Management. 58(2): 102-440.

65. Sun, H., Saeedi, P., Karuranga, S., Pinkepank,

66. M., Ogurtsova, K., Duncan, B. B., Stein,

67. C., Basit, A., Chan, J. C., Mbanya, J. C.,

68. Pavkov, M. E., Ramachandaran, A., Wild,

69. S. H., James, S. J., Herman, W. H., Zhang,

70. P., Bommer, C., Kuo, S., Boyko, E. J and

71. Magliano, D. J. 2022. IDF Diabetes Atlas:

72. Global, regional and country-level

73. diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021

74. and projections for 2045. Diabetes

75. Research and Clinical Practice. 183:

76. -119.

Downloads

Published

31-03-2024

How to Cite

MALSAWMKIMI HAUHNAR. (2024). DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF NOVEL DIABETES NUTRITION EDUCATION TOOLKIT TAILORED FOR MIZO ADULTS (A. THIRUMANI DEVI & VANLALHRUAII, Trans.). The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 52(1), 69-75. https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2024.52.1.08