A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON CHARACTERIZATION OF PROCESSED AND UNPROCESSED SORGHUM FLOURS


531 / 131

Authors

  • S.M. DEVATHA Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women, Coimbatore – 641 043
  • RAAJESWARI PARAMASIVAM Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women, Coimbatore – 641 043

https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2024.52.1.09

Keywords:

Germination, Property analysis, Roasting, Sorghum flour, grain

Abstract

The effect of physical, technological and functional properties of unprocessed, germinated and dry roasted grains and flours of sorghum were studied in the year 2023. The physical properties of the grains such as length, breadth, length/breadth ratio, thousand grain weight showed that, germinated grains measured minimal results as the stores were utilized for sprouting. Germinated sorghum yielded 94.6%, whereas, unprocessed and roasted yielded 91% of the total flour yield. The technological properties of the flours were analyzed as quality indicator. Bulk density, oil and water
holding capacity, and swelling capacity of the roasted flour were higher in quality when compared to unprocessed flour. Optical property indicated that roasted flour was darker and germinated sorghum flour was lighter than unprocessed flour. FTIR of germinated sorghum flour showed stronger peaks indicating the presence of polysaccharides. TGA of germinated sorghum flour exhibited maximum reaction zone due to changes in saccharides and dextrin. Roasted sorghum flour showed better properties that increase hardness, whereas, germinated flour soften the food product. Sorghum flour showed less than 7 x 10-1 CFU/g at day 180.

References

1. Akinola, S. A., Badejo, A. A., Osundahunsi, O. F

2. and Edema, M. O. 2017. Effect of

3. preprocessing techniques on pearl millet

4. flour and changes in technological

5. properties. International Journal of Food

6. Science and Technology. 52 (4):992-999.

7. Figure 3.TGA of sorghum flour

8. *SS – Unprocessed Sorghum Flour, SG – Germinated Sorghum Flour,

9. SR – Roasted Sorghum Flour

10. Devatha and Raajeswari Paramasivam

11. Anjitha, PK., Baskaran, N., Venkatachalapathy,

12. N and Tito Anand, M. 2021. Nutritional

13. changes of sorghum after popping by a

14. developed infrared assisted hot air

15. popping machine. International Journal

16. Current Microbiology and Applied Science.

17. (01): 3620-3627.

18. Birhanu, S. 2021. Potential benefits of sorghum

19. [Sorghum bicolor (l.) moench] on human

20. health: A review. International Journal of

21. Food Engineering and Technology.

22. (1): 8-18.

23. Kane-Potaka, J., Anitha, S., Tsusaka, T. W.,

24. Botha, R., Budumuru, M., Upadhyay, S and

25. Nedumaran, S. 2021. Assessing millets

26. and sorghum consumption behaviour in

27. urban India: A large-scale survey. Frontiers

28. in Sustainable Food Systems. 5:680777.

29. Khatoniar, S and Das, P. 2020. Physical and

30. functional properties of some millet

31. varieties of Assam. International Journal of

32. Current Microbiology and Applied

33. Sciences. 9 (5):1508-1515.

34. Lin, H., Bean, S. R., Tilley, M., Peiris, K. H. S and

35. Brabec, D. 2021. Qualitative and

36. quantitative analysis of sorghum grain

37. composition including protein and tannins

38. using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Food

39. Analytical Methods. 14: 268-279.

40. Llopart, E. E and Drago, S. R. 2016.

41. Physicochemical properties of sorghum

42. and technological aptitude for popping,

43. nutritional changes after popping. LWT -

44. Food Science and Technology. 71: 316-

45. Makawi, A. B., Mustafa, A. I., Adiamo, O. Q and

46. Mohamed Ahmed, I. A. 2019.

47. Physicochemical, nutritional, functional,

48. rheological, and microbiological properties

49. of sorghum flour fermented with baobab

50. fruit pulp flour as starter. Food Science and

51. Nutrition. 7 (2): 689-699.

52. Olamiti, G., Takalani, T. K., Beswa, D and Jideani,

53. A. I. O. 2020. Effect of malting and

54. fermentation on colour, thermal properties,

55. functional groups and crystallinity level of

56. flours from pearl millet (Pennisetum

57. glaucum) and sorghum (Sorghum

58. bicolor). Heliyon. 6 (12): e05467.

59. Paliwal, A and Sharma, N. 2022. Fermentation

60. kinetics of sorghum grain and effects of wet

61. processing on structural and chemical

62. properties of sorghum flour. Vegetos.

63. pp.1-8.

64. Ranganathan, V., Nunjundiah, I. T and

65. Bhattacharya, S. 2014. Effect of roasting

66. on rheological and functional properties of

67. sorghum flour. Food Science and

68. Technology International. 20(8): 579-589.

69. Wang, Y., Chen, L., Yang, T., Ma, Y., Mc

70. Clements, D. J., Ren, F and Jin, Z. 2021. A

71. review of structural transformations and

72. properties changes in starch during

73. thermal processing of foods. Food

74. Hydrocolloids. 113: 106543.

Downloads

Published

31-03-2024

How to Cite

S.M. DEVATHA. (2024). A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON CHARACTERIZATION OF PROCESSED AND UNPROCESSED SORGHUM FLOURS (RAAJESWARI PARAMASIVAM, Trans.). The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 52(1), 76-84. https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2024.52.1.09