INSTITUTIONAL FARM CREDIT– INPUT - OUTPUT TREND ANALYSIS: A STUDY FROM KALABURAGI DISTRICT, KARNATAKA


461 / 99

Authors

  • MD MOHSIN KHAN Department of Economics,Central University of Karnataka,Kalaburagi - 585 367
  • ANEETTA BENNY Department of Economics,Central University of Karnataka,Kalaburagi - 585 367

https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2024.52.1.15

Keywords:

Agricultural Credit, Farm Productivity, Input-output relationship, Karnataka Economy, Mechanization of Farming

Abstract

This research (2022–2023) examined the impact of institutional credit on farm inputs and output by farmers in Kalaburagi district of Karnataka using the panel data at district level covering the period between 2001 and 2020. The farmers rely heavily on credit mechanisms to modernize their agricultural activities. To assess the functional relationship between agriculture input-output and institutional credit, correlation and multiple regression analysis was conducted. The results showed that modern farm inputs are highly responsive to formal farm credit. An attempt was made to measure the degree and intensity of usage of modern farm inputs with availed credit and its implication on agricultural output in the region. One of the notable results was that farmers’ increased credit capacity has enabled them to procure inputs such as quality seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, and farm mechanization.

References

1. Ambaraya, B.H. 2022. Essay on agricultural

2. credit in Gulbarga district. Ph.D. Thesis

3. submitted to Gulbarga University,

4. Kalaburagi.

5. Awotide B.A., Abdoulaye T., Alene,A and

6. Manyong, V.M. 2015. Impact of access

7. to credit onagricultural productivity:

8. Evidence from smallholder cassava

9. farmers in Nigeria. Paper presented at

10. the International Conference of

11. Agriculture Economists, Milan, Italy.

12. August 9-14, 2015. pp.61-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00058-015-1702-2

13. Fink, G., Jack, B.K and Masiye F.2020. Season

14. -al liquidity, rural labour markets, and

15. agricultural production. American

16. Economic Review. 110 (11):3351–3392.

17. DoI:https://doi.org/10.1257/AER. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer

18. Hemming, D. J., Chirwa, E. W., Dorward, A.,

19. Ruffhead, H. J., Hill, R., Osborn, J.,

20. Langer, L, Harman, Asaoka, H., Coffey,

21. C and Phillips, D. 2018. Agricultural input

22. subsidies for improving productivity, farm

23. income, consumer welfare and wider

24. growth in low and lower middle income

25. countries: a system aticreview. Campbell

26. Systematic Reviews.14(1):1–153.https:/

27. /doi.org/10.4073/csr.2018.4

28. Kumar, M. 2023. Financial performance of

29. cooperative banks in Karnataka state.

30. Mukt Shabd Journal. 9(5):3082-3092.

31. D o I : h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 3 1 4 0 /

32. RG.2.2.32184.52489

33. Luan, D. X and Bauer, S. 2016. Does credit

34. access affect household income

35. homogeneously across different groups

36. of credit recipients? Evidence from rural

37. Vietnam. Journal of Rural Studies.

38. :186–203. DoI:https://doi.org/10.1016/

39. j.jrurstud.2016.08.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/08/001

40. Manoharan, N and Varkey, R. S. 2022.

41. Agricultural credit and agricultural

42. productivity across Indian states: An

43. analysis. Journal of Public Affairs. 22

44. (3):1–12. DoI: https://doi.org/10.1002/

45. pa.2597

46. Nakazi Florence, S. N. 2020. The effect of

47. commercial banks’ agricultural credit on

48. agricultural growth in Uganda. African

49. Journal of Economic Review. 8(1): 162–

50. Paramasivan, C and Pasupathi, R. 2016.

51. Performance of agro-based industries in

52. India. National Journal of Advanced

53. Research. 2(6): 25–28.

54. Sahoo, A. K. 2021. Structure of agricultural

55. credit system in India. International

56. Journal of Economics Commerce and

57. Research. 3(5): 60-68.

58. Sangeetha, R., Kavitha, B and Shanmugam,

59. T. R. 2016. Factors influencing farm

60. investment in borrower and nonborrower

61. farm firms in Tamilnadu.

62. InternationalResearch Journal of

63. Agricultural Economics and Statistics.

64. (1):22–28. DoI: https://doi.org/

65. 15740/ has/irjaes/7.1/22-28

66. Sankaran, M. 2021. Productivity and efficiency

67. of agricultural credit in Tamilnadu with

68. particular reference to Krishnagiri

69. district. Ph.D. Thesis submitted to

70. Pondicherry University, Puducherry.

71. Sujesh,C.P. 2018. A study on the efficiency of

72. agricultural credit in Kerala. Ph.D. Thesis

73. submitted to Mahatma Gandhi University,

74. Kerala.

75. Mohsin Khan and Aneeta Benny

76. MD. Mohsin, K and Aneetta, B. 2024. Institutional farm credit – Input-output

77. trend analysis: Study from Kalaburagi district– Karnataka.

78. The Journal of Research ANGRAU. 52(1) : 135-146

Downloads

Published

31-03-2024

How to Cite

MD MOHSIN KHAN. (2024). INSTITUTIONAL FARM CREDIT– INPUT - OUTPUT TREND ANALYSIS: A STUDY FROM KALABURAGI DISTRICT, KARNATAKA (ANEETTA BENNY, Trans.). The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 52(1), 134-145. https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2024.52.1.15