CULTURAL VARIABILITY OF TRICHODERMA ISOLATES IN CHICKPEA GROWN SOILS OF GUNTUR DISTRICT


297 / 81

Authors

  • M. SANDHYA Department of Plant Pathology, Agricultural College, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Bapatla- 522 101
  • S. KHAYUM AHAMMED Department of Plant Pathology, Agricultural College, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Bapatla- 522 101
  • S. L. BHATTIPROLU Department of Plant Pathology, Agricultural College, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Bapatla- 522 101
  • M. SREEKANTH Department of Plant Pathology, Agricultural College, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Bapatla- 522 101

https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2024.52.1.16

Abstract

.

References

1. Gams, W and Bissett, J. 2002. Morphology and

2. identification of Trichoderma. In: Kubicek,

3. C.P and Harman, G.E. (Eds.). Trichoderma

4. & Gliocladium Volume. I: Basic Biology,

5. Taxonomy and Genetics.Taylor and

6. Francis Ltd. pp. 3-31.

7. Harman, G.E., Howell, C.R., Viterbo, A., Chet, I

8. andLorito, M. 2004.Trichoderma speciesopportunistic,

9. avirulent plant symbionts.

10. Nature Review Microbiology. 2: 43–56.

11. Kai, P.M., Fabrizzio A.A., de Soares, M.N., da

12. Costa, R.M., Félix,J.P., de Jesusy, J.M.I and

13. da Cunhay, M.G. 2019. Measurement by

14. images of mycelial growth of fungal

15. colonies on Petri dishes. IEEE Canadian

16. Conference of Electrical and Computer

17. Engineering (CCECE). pp.4-5.

18. Kumari,D., Yadav, N., Kumhar, K C., Kumar, A

19. and Vashisht, P. 2023. Antagonistic

20. potential and growth promoting activities

21. of native Trichoderma isolates against

22. Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri. The

23. Indian Journal of Agricultural

24. Sciences. 93(7):780-785.

25. Mohammad, S., Srivastava, M., Sharma, A.,

26. Kumar, V., Sonika, P and Anuradha, S.

27. Morphological, molecular

28. identification and SSR marker analysis of

29. a potential strain of Trichoderma/Hypocrea

30. for production of a bioformulation. Journal

31. of Plant Pathology and Microbiology. 4: 10.

32. Muthu, K.A and Pratibha, S. 2016. Morphological

33. characterization of biocontrol isolates of

34. Trichoderma to study the correlation

35. between morphological characters and

36. biocontrol efficacy. International Letters of

37. Natural Sciences. 55: 57-67.

38. Sangle, U.R., Chinchure, S.S and Mishra, J.S.

39. Cultural diversity of Trichoderma

40. spp. isolated from different agro-climatic

41. regions. International Journal of Pure and

42. Applied Bioscience. 5 (2): 1012-1016.

43. Sharma, K.K and Singh, U.S. 2014. Cultural and

44. morphological characterization of

45. rhizospheric isolates of fungal antagonist

46. Trichoderma. Journal of Applied and

47. Natural Science. 6 (2): 451-456.

48. Younesi, H., Bazgir, E., Darvishnia, M and Chehri,

49. K. 2021. Selection and control efficiency

50. of Trichoderma isolates against Fusarium

51. oxysporum f. sp. ciceris in

52. Iran. Physiological and Molecular Plant

53. Pathology. 116: 101731.

Downloads

Published

31-03-2024

How to Cite

M. SANDHYA. (2024). CULTURAL VARIABILITY OF TRICHODERMA ISOLATES IN CHICKPEA GROWN SOILS OF GUNTUR DISTRICT (S. KHAYUM AHAMMED, S. L. BHATTIPROLU, & M. SREEKANTH, Trans.). The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 52(1), 146-153. https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2024.52.1.16