Influence of bull exposure on the behavioural intensity of estrus in Sahiwal heifers (Bos Indicus)


Abstract views: 321 / PDF downloads: 198

Authors

  • Sanjay Choudhary Principal Scientist, Livestock production Management Division, ICAR-NDRI, Karnal
  • M L Kamboj
  • Nitin Raheja
  • Kotresh Prasad C
  • Pawan Singh ,
  • Nishant Kumar
  • Deepandita Barman
  • Mukesh Bhakat

Keywords:

Biostimulation, estrus intensity, fenceline, Sahiwal, silent estrus

Abstract

Present study was conducted to study the influence of presence of bull on the behavioural signs of estrus expressed by Sahiwal heifers. For this experiment, a total of 24 Sahiwal heifers were allotted to 3 groups (T0, T1 and T2) of 8 animals each, based on the age and body weight. In T0, the heifers were isolated from the bull; in T1 group, the heifers were in contact with the bull through a fenceline exposure and in T2 group, the heifers were exposed through a fenceline contact (24 hours) with bull along with direct contact (for 6 hours) through another bull in the heifer shed. Estrus detection was done by bulls in T1 and T2 heifers group whereas in T0 group, heifers heat expectancy chart and visual observation of behavioural signs of estrus were used for estrus detection. Overall mean intensity of sniffing/licking, tail raising, micturition, chin resting and allowing mounting attempts during silent estrus in T0 was largely weak (88.64%) and in T1 heifers group, intensity was weak to moderate (60.05 and 34.58 %) whereas in T2 group, percentage of weak, moderate and intense was 38.5 %, 27.0 % and 34.4 % respectively. The per cent mean intensity of estrus behaviour in second estrus was weak to moderate (71.875 and 28.12) in T0, whereas in T1 group, intensity was largely weak to moderate (42.9 % and 41.3%) and intensity of cardinal signs of estrus in T2 was mostly moderate to intense in nature (31.9 % and 57.7%). It can be concluded that bull biostimulation of Sahiwal heifers through direct contact plus fenceline contact was more effective in increasing estrus behaviour intensity as compared to the only fenceline contact. Most prominent cardinal symptoms of estrus in biostimulated as well as non-biostimulated Sahiwal heifers were sniffing and licking, micturition, tail raising, allowing mounting attempts and chin resting.

Author Biography

  • Sanjay Choudhary, Principal Scientist, Livestock production Management Division, ICAR-NDRI, Karnal

     , 

References

Chenoweth PJ (1983) Sexual Behavior of the Bull: A Review. J Dairy Sci 66: 173-179

Dash PC (1980) Reproductive behaviour of dairy cows (Bos indicus, Bos Taurus and BosTaurus × Bos indicus). Ph.D. Thesis. (NDRI) Panjab, University Chandigarh.

Helmer SD, Britt JH (1985) Mounting behavior as affected by stage of estrous cycle in Holstein heifers. J Dairy Sci 68:1290–1296

Kumaresan A, Ansari MR and Sanwal PC (2001) Assessment of the accuracy of oestrus detection by progesterone assay in cattle and buffaloes. Indian J Anim Sci 71(8): 34-36

Kyle SD, Callahan CJ and Allrich RD (1992). Effect of progesterone on the expression of estrus at the first postpartum ovulation in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 75: 1456-1460.

Layak SS, Mohanty TK, Kumaresan A, Behera K and Chand S (2011) Behavioural signs of estrus and their relationship to time of ovulation in zebu (Sahiwal) cattle. Anim Reprod Sci 129: 140-145

López-Gatius F (2003) Is fertility declining in dairy cattle? A retrospective study in north-eastern Spain. Theriogenology 60:89–99

Lyimo ZC, Nielen M, Ouweltjes W, Kruip TAM, van Eerdenburg FJCM (2000) Relationship among estradiol, cortisol and intensity of estrous behavior in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 53 (9): 1783–1795

Mangal V (2009) Study on Estrous Behaviour, Cervical Mucus Characteristics and Fertility in Sahiwal Cattle. M.V. Sc. Thesis. NDRI, Karnal, Haryana, India

Madkar AR, Lathwal SS, Mohanty TK, Abdullah M and Santosh K (2015) Estrous confirmation on the basis of behavioural signs of intensity in Crossbred cows. Indian Vet J 92(6):60-61

Mattoni M, Ouedraogo A (2000) A comparative study on the estrus response to PGF2_ analogue treatment, and conception rates according to time of AI, in Zebu (Bos indicus) and Baoule (Bos taurus) cattle. Trop. Anim. Health Prod 32: 127–134

Mondal M, Rajkhowa C, Prakash BS (2006) Relationship of plasma estradiol-17â, total estrogen and progesterone to estrus behaviour in Mithun (Bos frontalis) cows. Horm Behav 49: 626-633

Orihuela A (2000) Some factors affecting the behavioural manifestation of oestrus in cattle: a review. Appl Anim Behav Sci 70:1–16

Parikh SS, Patbandha TK, Savaliya BD, Makwana RB, Raval RJ, Kapadiya PS (2018) Association of estrous behaviour and cervical mucus properties with conception in Gir cows. J Pharm Phyto 1: 310-314

Roelofs JB, Van Eerdenburg FJCM, Soede NM, Kemp B (2005) Pedometer readings for estrous detection and as predictor for time of ovulation in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 6: 1690–1703

Roelofs JB, Soede NM, Voskamp-Harkema W, Kemp B (2008) The effect of fenceline bull exposure on expression of oestrus in dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci 108: 226–235

Shipka MP, Ellis LC (1998) No effects of bull exposure on expression of estrous behavior in high-producing dairy cows. Appl Anim Beha Sci 57: 1–7

Van Eerdenburg FJCM, Karthaus D, Taverne MAM, Merics I, Szenci O (2002) The relationship between estrus behavioral score and time of ovulation in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 85: 1150–1156

Walker SL, Smith RF, Routly JE, Jones DN, Morris MJ, Dobson H (2008) Lameness, activity time–budgets and estrus expression in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 91:4552–4559

Downloads

Submitted

2018-12-15

Published

2019-06-24

Issue

Section

ANIMAL PRODUCTION & REPRODUCTION

How to Cite

Choudhary, S., Kamboj, M. L., Raheja, N., C, K. P., Singh, P., Kumar, N., Barman, D., & Bhakat, M. (2019). Influence of bull exposure on the behavioural intensity of estrus in Sahiwal heifers (Bos Indicus). Indian Journal of Dairy Science, 72(3). https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJDS/article/view/85519