Differential muscle methylome analysis in Mali and Hampshire pig breeds


8 / 0 / 0

Authors

  • PRAJWALITA PATHAK Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Dhemaji, Simen Chapori 787 061, Assam, India
  • N H MOHAN ICAR-National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources, Karnal, Haryana 132 001, India image/svg+xml
  • JURI DEKA Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Dhemaji, Simen Chapori 787 061, Assam, India
  • JAYA BHARATI Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Dhemaji, Simen Chapori 787 061, Assam, India
  • A K DAS Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Dhemaji, Simen Chapori 787 061, Assam, India
  • R THOMAS Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Dhemaji, Simen Chapori 787 061, Assam, India
  • R SINGH Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Dhemaji, Simen Chapori 787 061, Assam, India
  • V K GUPTA Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Dhemaji, Simen Chapori 787 061, Assam, India
  • B C DAS Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Dhemaji, Simen Chapori 787 061, Assam, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v96i3.143165

Keywords:

DNA methylation, Muscle, Myogenesis, Pig

Abstract

Muscle development and carcass yield of meat indigenous and exotic pigs vary significantly. DNA methylation, being a major epigenetic factor, could regulate myogenic process through regulation of gene expression. The objective of the present study was to compare genome-wide methylation in indigenous (Mali) and exotic (Hampshire) breeds of pigs. A total 1549 differentially methylated regions (P<0.1) in the genome with hypermethylation around the promoter-transcription start site of MYMK gene were identified in Mali pigs. No differences in the DNA methylation was observed with respect to promoter region of other myogenic genes. Ontology of genes whose bodies were differentially methylated, were related to gaseous exchange, lipid metabolism, opioid, nephrin and DARPP-32 signalling. Based on the study, it may be concluded that differences exist in the muscle tissue DNA methylation between Mali and Hampshire pigs. Further studies are required to understand the implication of the differential methylation in myogenic process in pigs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Carrio E, Diez-Villanueva A, Lois S, Mallona I, Cases I, Forn M, Peinado M A and Suelves M. 2015. Deconstruction of DNA methylation patterns during myogenesis reveals specific epigenetic events in the establishment of the skeletal muscle lineage. Stem Cells 33(6): 2025–2036.

Carrio E and Suelves M. 2015. DNA methylation dynamics in muscle development and disease. Front Aging Neurosci 7: 19.

Chen B, You W, Wang Y and Shan T. 2020. The regulatory role of Myomaker and Myomixer-Myomerger-Minion in muscle development and regeneration. Cell Molecular Life Science 77(8): 1551-1569.

Chen Z, Chu S, Xu X, Jiang J, Wang W, Shen H, Li M, Zhang H, Mao Y and Yang Z. 2019. Analysis of longissimus muscle quality characteristics and associations with DNA methylation status in cattle. Genes Genomics 41(10): 1147–1163.

Jin L, Jiang Z, Xia Y, Lou P, Chen L, Wang H, Bai L, Xie Y, Liu Y, Li W, et al. 2014. Genome-wide DNA methylation changes in skeletal muscle between young and middle-aged pigs. BMC Genomics 15: 653.

Kechin A, Boyarskikh U, Kel A and Filipenko M. 2017. cutPrimers: A new tool for accurate cutting of primers from reads of targeted next generation sequencing. Journal of Comput Ational Biology 24(11): 1138-1143.

Li H and Durbin R. 2009. st and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25(14): 1754-1760.

Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R and Genome Project Data Processing S. 2009. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25(16): 2078-2079.

Li X J, Liu L Q, Dong H, Yang J J, Wang W W, Zhang Q, Wang C L, Zhou J and Chen H Q. 2021. Comparative genomewide methylation analysis of longissimus dorsi muscles in Yorkshire and Wannanhua pigs. Animal Genetics 52(1): 78–89.

Lienhard M, Grimm C, Morkel M, Herwig R and Chavez L. 2014. MEDIPS: genome-wide differential coverage analysis of sequencing data derived from DNA enrichment experiments. Bioinformatics 30(2): 284–286.

Mohan N H, Pathak P, Buragohain L, Deka J, Bharati J, Das A K, Thomas R, Singh R, Sarma D K, Gupta V K and Das B C. 2023. Comparative muscle transcriptome of Mali and Hampshire breeds of pigs: a preliminary study. Animal Biotechnology 34(8): 3946–3961.

Sharples A P, Stewart C E and Seaborne R A. 2016. Does skeletal muscle have an 'epi'-memory? The role of epigenetics in nutritional programming, metabolic disease, aging and exercise. Aging Cell 15(4): 603–616.

Shen L, Du J, Xia Y, Tan Z, Fu Y, Yang Q, Li X, Tang G, Jiang Y, Wang J, et al. 2016. Genome-wide landscape of DNA methylomes and their relationship with mRNA and miRNA transcriptomes in oxidative and glycolytic skeletal muscles. Scintific Reports 6: 32186.

Sohn R L, Huang P, Kawahara G, Mitchell M, Guyon J, Kalluri R, Kunkel L M and Gussoni E. 2009. A role for nephrin, a renal protein, in vertebrate skeletal muscle cell fusion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106(23): 9274–9279.

Tsumagari K, Baribault C, Terragni J, Varley K E, Gertz J, Pradhan S, Badoo M, Crain C M, Song L, Crawford G E, et al. 2013. Early de novo DNA methylation and prolonged demethylation in the muscle lineage. Epigenetics 8(3): 317–32.

Yang Y, Fan X, Yan J, Chen M, Zhu M, Tang Y, Liu S and Tang Z. 2021. A comprehensive epigenome atlas reveals DNA methylation regulating skeletal muscle development. Nucleic Acids Research 49(3): 1313–1329.

Yang Y, Liang G, Niu G, Zhang Y, Zhou R, Wang Y, Mu Y, Tang Z and Li K. 2017. Comparative analysis of DNA methylome and transcriptome of skeletal muscle in lean-, obese-, and minitype pigs. Scientific Report 7: 39883.

Yger M and Girault J A. 2011. DARPP-32, Jack of All Trades Master of Which? Front Behav Neurosci 5: 56.

Zhang W and Roy S. 2017. Myomaker is required for the fusion of fast-twitch myocytes in the zebrafish embryo. Developmental Biology 423(1): 24–33.

Zhang W, Zhang S, Xu Y, Ma Y, Zhang D, Li X and Zhao S. 2019. The DNA methylation status of wnt and tgfbeta signals is a key factor on functional regulation of skeletal muscle satellite cell development. Frontiers in Genetics 10: 220.

Zhang Y, Liu T, Meyer C A, Eeckhoute J, Johnson D S, Bernstein B E, Nusbaum C, Myers R M, Brown M, Li W and Liu X S. 2008. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biology 9(9): R137.

Submitted

2023-09-30

Published

2026-07-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

PATHAK, P. ., MOHAN, N. H. ., DEKA, J. ., BHARATI, J. ., DAS, A. K. ., THOMAS, R. ., SINGH, R. ., GUPTA, V. K. ., & DAS, B. C. . (2026). Differential muscle methylome analysis in Mali and Hampshire pig breeds. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 96(3), 243–246. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v96i3.143165
Citation