Influence of urea, formic acid and common salt on preservation and in situ rumen degradability of maize fodder at dough stage
74 / 35
Abstract
Chaffed green maize fodder (at soft dough stage) was preserved in polythene bags for 60 days after adding 3 chemicals, viz, urea, formic acid and common salt each at 3 levels, The treatment levels were; urea, 0 (U0, 0,25 (U1) and 0,5% (U2), formic acid 0 (F0), 0,3 (F1) and 0.4% (F2)' common salt 0 S0). 0.50 (S1) and 1 % (S2)' All 27 treatment combinations were tested for their efficacy in preserving maize fodder. Addition of urea and common salt to the trealmenl combinations reduced the DM loss by 23.30 and 19.30% respectively. Similarly, addition of urea to other treatment combinations reduced OM loss by 26,2%, The total·N, water.soluble-N, water·insoluble·N and NH3 contents increased by addition of urea. Lactic aCId and TVFA concentrations were lowest (6.87, 7.39%) with urea-·salt treatmen combinalions restricting them significantly (p<0.05) in presence of salt. DM and OM degtadabilities incrcased when urea and cornman salt were used as preservative. lhe investigation revealed that maize fodder (dough stage) can be preserved by using combination of urea (0.25 to 0.5%) and salt (0.5 to 1.0%) on fresh basis.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Issue
Section
Articles
License
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.
How to Cite
THAKUR, S. S., & SHARMA, D. D. (2013). Influence of urea, formic acid and common salt on preservation and in situ rumen degradability of maize fodder at dough stage. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 65(9). https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAnS/article/view/33732