Comparative ovarian biometry and oocyte retrieval methods in pig

Authors

  • Biswajit saikia ICAR-National Research Centre on Pig, Rani, Guwahati - 781 131
  • Soumen Naskar ICAR-Indian Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology, Ranchi - 834 010, Jharkhand
  • Yoya vashi ICAR-National Research Centre on Pig, Rani, Guwahati - 781 131
  • Santanu Banik ICAR-National Research Centre on Pig, Rani, Guwahati - 781 131
  • Rajendran Thomas ICAR-National Research Centre on Pig, Rani, Guwahati - 781 131
  • Ajay Kumar Singh ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar 243122, Uttar Pradesh
  • Dilip Kumar Sarma ICAR-National Research Centre on Pig, Rani, Guwahati - 781 131
  • Sujoy Kumar Dhara ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar 243122, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Keywords:

Aspiration, biometry, grading, oocyte, slicing

Abstract

Biometry and follicular parameters of porcine ovaries sourced from organized and unorganized-slaughterhouses and relative comparison of oocyte retrieval methods, namely aspiration and slicing, are reported in the present study. Average length and width of the ovaries, and numbers of surface and cystic follicles were higher in ovaries sourced from organized slaughterhouses. Average number of oocytes recovered per ovary by slicing (12.93±1.49) was significantly higher (P<0.01) than aspiration (6.36±1.02). However, aspiration yielded higher percentage (65.21±5.71) of good quality oocytes (A) (P<0.01) suitable for upstream applications of assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Further, our study reveals that ovaries sourced from unorganized slaughterhouses can also be used for ART, and use of aspiration method may yield better quality oocytes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bartol, F.F., Wiley, A.A., Spencer, T.E., Vallet, J.L. and Christenson, R.K. (1993). Early uterine development in pigs. J. Reprod. Fertil., 48: 99-116.

Choi, M.H., Gong, S.P. and Lim, J.M. (2008). Retrieval of porcine ovarian follicles by different methods. Asian Australas J. Anim. Sci., 21(3): 353-357.

Dyck, G.W. and Swiestra, E.E. (1983). Growth of the reproductive tract of the gilt from birth to puberty. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 63: 81-87.

Islam, M.R., Khandoker, M.A.M.Y., Afroz, S., Rahman, M.G.M. and Khan, R.I. (2007). Qualitative and quantitative analysis of goat ovaries, follicles and oocytes in view of in vitro production of embryos. ‎J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B, 8(7): 465-469.

Naskar, S., Borah, S., Vashi, Y., Thomas, R., Dhara, S.K. and Banik, S. (2015). Evaluation of pig rearing farmers of north east India as prospective breeder: A retrospective analysis. Ind. J. Anim. Res., 49(1): 123-126.

Ramsingh, L., Sadasivarao, K. and Muralimohan, K. (2013). Ovarian biometrics and oocyte grading percentage of yield in local goats of Andhra Pradesh. IOSR J. Pharm., 3(1): 47-49.

Wang, Z.G., Yu, S.D. and Xu, Z.R. (2007). Effects of collection methods on recovery efficiency, maturation rate and subsequent embryonic developmental competence of oocytes in Holstein cow. Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci., 20(4): 496-500.

Wani, N.A., Wani, G.M., Khan, M.Z. and Salahudin, S. (2000). Effect of oocyte harvesting techniques on in vitro maturation and in vitro fertilization in sheep. Small Rumin. Res., 36: 63-67.

Zeinoaldini , S., Jafari , Z., Sarmast , F., Torbati , E. and Davachi, N.D. ( 2013). Different harvesting techniques used in ovine in vitro embryo production. Scimetr, 1(1): 1-5.

Downloads

Published

01-09-2023

Issue

Section

Short Communications

How to Cite

Biswajit saikia, Soumen Naskar, Yoya vashi, Santanu Banik, Rajendran Thomas, Ajay Kumar Singh, Dilip Kumar Sarma, & Sujoy Kumar Dhara. (2023). Comparative ovarian biometry and oocyte retrieval methods in pig. Indian Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Research, 47(2), 1305-1309. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJVASR/article/view/137226