Genetic discrimination of Muzaffarnagri and Munjal sheep of northwestern semi arid zone of India based on microsatellite markers and morphological traits

DINESH KUMAR YADAV; REENA ARORA

doi:10.56093/ijans.v84i5.40666

Authors

DINESH KUMAR YADAV National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources, Karnal, Haryana 132 001 India
REENA ARORA National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources, Karnal, Haryana 132 001 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v84i5.40666

Keywords:

Discriminant analysis, Microsatellite markers, Morphometric, Munjal sheep, Muzaffarnagri sheep, Semi arid, Sheep, Trait

Abstract

Muzaffarnagri and Munjal are both mutton-type and highly course-wooled sheep of north-western-semi arid zone of India. Muzaffarnagri is a descript sheep breed while Munjal is not recognized as a breed at the national level. The present study examines the genetic differentiation based on microsatellite markers and morphometric traits using multivariate analysis. A total of 194 Munjal and 294 Muzaffarnagri sheep were described for 7 body measurements for morphometric characterization. The study included animals aged between 2- to 8-teeth, raised under field conditions in semi-arid environment. The univariate analysis revealed that Munjal sheep were larger and heavier than Muzaffarnagri sheep. The sexual dimorphism (m/f) was 1.13 (Munjal) and 1.11 (Muzaffarnagri). Munjal males were 37% heavier than females, whereas Muzaffarnagri males were 27% heavier than females. The coefficient of variation of all traits ranged from 4.14 to 33.67%. Flock and age effects established high heterogeneity among females of different flocks in both breeds/populations, whereas in males these effects showed homogeneity between flocks in Muzaffarnagri sheep and heterogeneity in Munjal sheep. Step-wise discriminant analysis revealed that paunch girth followed by tail length was more discriminating for the 2 sheep breeds/populations. The Mahalanobis distance (3.65, female; 4.56, male) between 2 sheep breeds was high and significant. Nearest Neighbour Discriminant Analysis showed that 86.31% of Muzaffarnagri females and 90.48% of Munjal males were classified into their source population. Microsatellite markers data showed high level of allelic richness (>6.0) and genetic diversity (>0.7) for both breeds/populations. Bayesian cluster analysis also indicated distinct clusters with average membership coefficient of 0.974 and 0.972 for Muzaffarnagri and Munjal sheep respectively. The results based on morphological and microsatellite data revealed that these sheep belong to genetically distinct groups. The findings emerged on genetic and phenotypic analyses would serve as important inputs for designing conservation and improvement strategy for these sheep breeds/populations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arora R and Bhatia S. 2004. Genetic structure of Muzaffarnagri sheep based on microsatellite analysis. Small Ruminant Research 54: 227–30.

Arora R, Bhatia S, Yadav D K and Mishra B P. 2011. Current genetic profile of sheep breeds/populations from Northwestern semi arid zone of India. Livestock Science 135: 193–98.

Goudet J. 1995 FSTAT (vers. 2.9.3): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. Journal of Heredity 86, 485–486.

Kunene N W, Bezuidenhout C C and Nsahlai I V. 2009. Genetic and phenotypic diversity in Zulu sheep populations: implications for population. Small Ruminant Research 84: 100–07.

Kumar D, Singh G, Jain A. 2006. Characterization and evaluation of Muzaffarnagri sheep. Indian Journal of Small Ruminants 12 (1): 48–55.

Kushwaha B P, Riyazuddin, Singh R N and Parthasarathy S. 1999. Characteristics of Munjal sheep. Animal Genetic Resource Information 25: 27–31.

Mandal A, Singh L B and Rout P K. 2000. The Muzaffarnagri sheep, a mutton breed in India. Animal Genetic Resource Information 28: 19–25.

Nei M, Tajima F and Tateno Y. 1983. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. Journal of Molecular Evolution 19:153–70.

Peter C, Bruford M, Perez T, Dalamitra S, Hewitt G, Erhardt G and the ECONOGENE Consortium. 2007 Genetic diversity and subdivision of 57 European and Middle-Eastern sheep breeds. Animal Genetics 38: 37–44.

Pritchard J K, Stephens M and Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945–59.

Rege J E O. 2002. Defining livestock breeds in the context of community-based management of farm animal genetic resources. Animal Genetic Resources. Virtual Library CD- ROM. GTZ, SACCAR and ILRI. ILRI-Ethiopia@cgiar.org, Nairobi.

Saitbekova N, Schlapfer J, Dolf G and Gaillard C. 2001. Genetic relationships in Swiss sheep breeds based on microsatellite analysis. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 118: 379– 87.

SAS, 2009. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Release 9.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

Singh G, Jain A and Yadav D K. 2007. Evaluation of Nali sheep under field conditions. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 77 (11): 1158—60.

Traoré A, Tamboura H H, Kabore A, Royo L J, Fernández I, Álvarez I, Sangare M, Bouchel D, Poivey J P, Francois D, Toguyeni A, Sawadogo L and Goyache F. 2008. Multivariate characterization of morphological traits in Burkina Faso sheep. Small Ruminant Research 80: 62–67.

Yadav D K, Singh G, Jain A, Singh S and Paul A K. 2009. Fitting of growth models and evaluation of Marwari sheep under field conditions. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 79 (12): 1242–44.

Yadav D K, Arora R, Bhatia S and Singh G. 2010. Management and Conservation of Munjal Sheep: A threatened sheep population of North-West India. Journal of Livestock Biodiversity 2(1): 20–22.

Yadav D K, Arora R, Bhatia S and Singh G. 2011. Short tandem repeat based analysis of genetic variability in Munjal-the threatened sheep population of Northwestern India. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 81(2): 171–75.

Yadav D K, Arora R, Bhatia S and Singh G. 2011a. Morphological characterization, production and reproduction status of Munjal –A threatened sheep population of North-West India. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 81(9): 943–45.

Yadav D K, Jain A, Singh G, Arora R and Bhatia S. 2012. A comparison of body biometry traits of Munjal and Muzaffarnagri sheep under field conditions. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 82(2): 216–19.

Yadav D K, Jain A, Kulkarni V S, Govindaiah M G, Aswathnarayan T and Sadana D K. 2013. Classification of four ovine breeds of southern peninsular zone of India: Morphometric study using classical discriminant function analysis. SpringerPlus 2:29. doi:10.1186/2193–1801-2-29.

Yakubu A and Akinyemi M O. 2010. An evaluation of sexual size dimorphism in Uda sheep using multifactorial discriminant analysis. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Animal Science 60: 74–78.