Descriptive sensory profiling of thandai using principal component analysis


475 / 218

Authors

  • Rekha Chawla Assistant Professor (Dairy Technology)
  • Manpinder Kaur M.Tech student
  • S Sivakumar Deptt. of Dairy Technology Asstt. Scientist (DT)

Keywords:

Milk beverage, 100-point scale, Principal component analysis, Quantitative descriptive analysis.

Abstract

Thandai being nutrient crammed pabulum is relished as a traditional milk-based beverage in India. Being indigenous drink, international and national level research work and the literature pertaining to the same is not available. Thus, the present study was undertaken to investigate and characterize the sensory attributes of commercially available thandai using Quantitative Descriptive Analysis (QDA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA). QDA revealed statistically significant (p<0.05) difference in sensory attributes of thandai amongst the market samples. PCA identified three significant principal components that accounted for 93.01 per cent of the variation in the sensory data. Correlation matrix revealed many linear relationships between independent terms of sensory attributes.

Author Biographies

  • Rekha Chawla, Assistant Professor (Dairy Technology)

    Deptt. of Dairy Technology

    Asstt. Prof. (DT)

  • Manpinder Kaur, M.Tech student
    DairyTechnology
  • S Sivakumar, Deptt. of Dairy Technology Asstt. Scientist (DT)
    Deptt. of Dairy Technology

References

1. Adhikari K, Chamber E, Miller R, Vazquez LA, Bhumiratana N, Phillip C (2011) Development of a lexicon for beef flavor intact muscle. J Sens Stud 26:413-420

2. Basker D (1988) Applied Sensory Analysis Chapter II. pp. 125-143. CRC Press, Boca Raton, New York

3. Chapman KW, Lawless HT, Boor KJ (2001) Quantitative descriptive analysis and principal component analysis for sensory characterization of ultrapasteurized milk. J Dairy Sci 84:12–20

4. Chawla R, Patil GR, Singh AK (2014) Sensory characterization of doda burfi (Indian milk cake) using Principal Component Analysis. J Food Sci Technol 51:558-564

5. Civille GV, Lapsley K, Huang G, Yada S, Seltsam J (2010) Development of an almond lexicon to assess the sensory properties of almond varieties. J Sens Stud 25:146-162

6. Ghosh D, Chattopadhyay P (2012) Application of principal component analysis (PCA) as a sensory assessment tool for fermented food products. J Food Sci Technol 49:328–334

7. Desai NT, Shepard L, Drake MA (2013) Sensory properties and drivers of liking for Greek yogurts. J Dairy Sci 96:7454–7466

8. Drake MA, Civille GV (2003) Flavor lexicons. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2:33-40

9. Drake M.A, JonesVS, Russell T, Harding R, Gerard PD (2007) Comparison of lexicons for descriptive analysis of whey and soy proteins in New Zealand and the U.S.A. J Sens Stud 22:433-452

10. Drake SL, Yates MD, Drake MA (2010) Development of a flavor lexicon for processed and imitation cheese. J Sens Stud 25:720-739

11. Drewnowski A (1997) Taste preferences and food intake. J Annu Rev Nutr 17:237-253

12. Hunter EA, Mcewan JA (1998) Evaluation of an international ring trial for sensory profiling of hard cheese. Food Qual Prefer 9:343-354

13. Kaaki D, Kebbe OB, Najm NE, Olabi A (2012) Preference mapping of commercial Labneh (strained yogurt) products in the Lebanese market. J Dairy Sci 95:521–532

14. Keane P (1992) The flavor Profile. In: ASTM Manual on Descriptive Analysis Testing (13th edition). pp. 5-14. Hootman, R.C. (Ed.) ASTM, Philadelphia, PA

15. Keast RSJ, Lau JJ (2006) Culture-specific variation in the flavor profile of Soymilks. J Food Sci 71:567-572

16. Lawless HT, Heymann H (1998) Sensory Evaluation of food: Practice and Principles, Chapter II. pp. 165-167. Chapman and Hall, New York

17. Martinez ME, Marshall JR, Sechrest L (1998) Invited Commentary: factor analysis and the search for objectivity. Am J Epidemiol 148:17–19

18. Maynard AA, Pangborn RM, Roessler EB (1965) Principles of Sensory Evaluation of Food, Chapter III. pp. 220. Academic Press, London

19. Meilgard MC, Civille GV, Carr BT (2007) Sensory Evaluation Techniques, Chapter I. pp. 8. CRC Press, New York

20. Murray JM, Delahunty CM, Baxter IA (2001) Descriptive sensory analysis: Past, present and future. Food Res Int 34:461-471

21. Parente ME, Gambaro A, Ares G (2008) Sensory characterization of emollients. J Sens Stud 23:149-161

22. Piggott JR, Hunter EA (1999) Evaluation of assessor performance in sensory analysis. Ital J Food Sci 4:289-303

23. Puri R, Khamrui K, Khetra Y, Malhotra R, Devraja HC (2015) Quantitative descriptive analysis and principal component analysis for sensory characterization of Indian milk product cham-cham. J Food Sci Technol 53:1238-1246

24. Sabbe S, Verbeke W, Deliza R, Matta VM, Van P (2009) Consumer liking of fruit juices with different acai (Euterpe oleracea Mart) concentrations. J Food Sci 74:171-176

25. Stone H, Sidel JL (1998) Quantitative descriptive analysis: developments, applications and the future. J Food Technol 52:48–52

26. Thompson JL, Drake MA, Lopetcharat K, Yates MA (2004) Preference mapping of commercial chocolate milks. J Food Sci 69:406-413

27. Thompson K, Chambers DH, Chambers E (2009) Sensory characteristics of ice cream produced in the United States and Italy. J Sens Stud 24:396-414

28. Youn K, Park JH, Lee J, Jeong WS, Tang CH, Jun M (2016) The identification of Biochanin A as a potent and selective β-Site app-cleaving enzyme 1 (Bace1) inhibitor. J Hum Nutr 8:637

29. Young ND, Drake M, Lopecharat K, Daniel MR (2004) Preference mapping of Cheddar cheese with varying maturity levels. J Dairy Sci 87:11–19 

Downloads

Published

2021-01-06

Issue

Section

DAIRY PROCESSING

How to Cite

Chawla, R., Kaur, M., & Sivakumar, S. (2021). Descriptive sensory profiling of thandai using principal component analysis. Indian Journal of Dairy Science, 74(2). https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJDS/article/view/101668