Milk quality and safety issues inside the farm gate of dairy farmers of Punjab (India)
747 / 252
Authors
-
Harmandeep Singh
Guru Angad Dev Veterinary & Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana
-
Jaswinder Singh
Guru Angad dev veterinary and animal sciences university,ludhiana,punjab
-
Harish Kumar Verma
Guru Angad Dev Veterinary & Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana
-
Suresh Kumar Kansal
Guru Angad Dev Veterinary & Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana
Keywords:
adulteration, dairy farmers, milk hygenicity, practicesAbstract
Milk quality and safety is the biggest concern of the Indians' dairy industry. Although milk contamination can occur at any stage of the milk value chain but farm contamination is supposed to be the major culprit. The present study investigated the perception and practices of dairy farmers about milk safety and quality at the farm level. Randomly selected dairy farmers (n -300), across the five different agro-climatic zones of Punjab, India, were surveyed using a pre-tested structured questionnaire. The study analyzed the awareness and practices of the respondents based on the five aspects namely milker's hygiene, animal hygiene, environmental hygiene, milk handling, and chemical residue in milk. Pooled milk samples collected from every alternate farm (n-150) were subjected to somatic cell count (SCC), fat, SNF, adulteration, and E.Coli contamination.  Data were analyzed using SPSS software through descriptive statistics, Chi-square test of independence with Cramer’s V value as measures of effect size. Analysis of variances, followed by Games Howell post hoc test was performed to analyze subgroup differences amongst explanatory variables.  The majority of farmers (64%) were found to have low knowledge scores related to all five aspects of milk quality and safety. The milk handling (ranked first) followed by animal hygiene, personal hygiene, environmental hygiene, and antibiotics and other residues in milk (ranked last) ordered wise aspects affecting milk quality and safety. Further, socio-demographic and farm characteristics of respondents have a positive influence on the farmer's knowledge of milk quality and safety. High SCC (Mean- 424000) and E .coli contamination in 24% samples further revealed poor adherence to hygienic milk practices. Only 5% of samples were found adulterated with water and 3% of samples were found to be urea positive.  Ignorance and lack of scientific knowledge among dairy farmers are the major hindrances in the production of quality and safe milk. An extensive awareness program on milk quality and safety, coupled with incentives on quality products should be undertaken to enhance the awareness of the small and medium dairy farmers.
References
Al Juhaiman LA (2010) Estimating Aluminum leaching from Aluminum cook wares in different meat extracts and milk. J Saudi Chem Soc 14: 131–137
BAHS (2019) Basic Animal Husbandry Statistics 2019. Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry & Dairying, Department of Animal Husbandry & Dairying, Government of India. New Delhi
Bonfoh B, Wasem A, Traore AN, Fan A, Spillmann H, Simb CF, Alfaroukh I O, Nicolet J, Farah Z, Zinsstag J (2003) Microbiological quality of cows’ milk taken at different intervals from the udder to the selling point in Bamako (Mali). Food Control 14: 495–500. DOI: 10.1016/S0956-7135(02)00109-3
Borghese A, Rasmussen M, Thomas CS (2007) Milking management of dairy buffalo. Italian J Anim Sci 6: 39–50
Chauhan AS ,George MS, Chatterjee P, Lindahl J, Grace D, Kakkar M (2018) The social biography of antibiotic use in smallholder dairy farms in India. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 7: 60
Chye FY, Abdullah A, Ayob MK (2004) Bacteriological quality and safety of raw milk in Malaysia. Food Microbiol 21: 535–541. DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2003.11.007
COI (2011) Census of India, 2011. Government of India, New Delhi
DACFW (2019) Annual Report 2018-2019.New Delhi. http://agricoop.nic.in/dac-organisation
Dhand NK, Khatkar MS (2014) Statulator: an online tool for basic statistical analysis. Available at: http://statulator.com/
FAO (1989) Milk Hygiene. In: Milk Production Hygiene and Udder Health, FAO (Eds.). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome
FAO (2011) Guide to Good Dairy Farming Practice. Animal Production and Health Guidelines, No. 8. Rome
FAO and WHO (1997) General Requirements (Food Hygiene).Codex Alimentarius(Supplement to Vol. 1B). Rome
Hundal JS, Sodhi SS, Gupta A, Singh J, Chahal US (2016) Awareness, knowledge, and risks of zoonotic diseases among livestock farmers in Punjab. Vet World 9: 186–18691
Islam MA, Islam MN, Khan MAS, Rashid MH, Obaidullah SM (1970) Effect of Different Hygenic Condition During Milking On Bacterial Count Of Cows’ Milk. Bangladesh J Anim Sci 38: 108–114. DOI: 10.3329/bjas.v38i1-2.9919
Kagoro JM, Chatiza K (2012) Zimbabwe’s Dairy Subsector. SNV. Harare. Zimbabwe. https://snv.org/cms/sites/default/files/explore/download/rarp_2016-dairy-subsector-study.pdf
Kumar A, Staal SJ (2010) Is traditional milk marketing and processing viable and efficient? An empirical evidence from Assam, India. Q J Int Agric 49: 213–225
Kumar A, Wright IA, Singh DK (2011) Adoption of Food Safety Practices in Milk Production: Implications for Dairy Farmers in India. J. Int. Food Agribusiness Mark 23: 330–344
Kumar V, Gupta J (2018) Prevailing practices in the use of antibiotics by dairy farmers in Eastern Haryana region of India. Vet World 11: 274–280. DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2018. 274-280
Ledo J, Hettinga KA, Bijman J, Luning PA (2019) Persistent challenges in safety and hygiene control practices in emerging dairy chains: The case of Tanzania. Food Control 105: 164–173. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.05.011
Lemma DH, Mengistu A, Kuma T, Kuma B (2018) Improving milk safety at farm-level in an intensive dairy production system: Relevance to smallholder dairy producers. Food Qual Saf 2: 135–143
Lingathurai S, Vellathurai P (2010) Bacteriological Quality And Safety Of Raw Cow Milk In Madurai South India. Webmed Central Microbio 1: 1029. Available at: http://www.webmedcentral.com/wmcpdf/Article_WMC001029.pdf.
Mahi GS, Kingra PK (2013) Agroclimatic Regions of Punjab.Fundamentals of Agrometeorology. Kalyani Publishers, India
Mdegela RH, Ryoba R, Karimuribo ED, Phiria E J, Løkenc T, Reksenc O, Mtengetib E, Uriob N A (2009) Prevalence of clinical and subclinical mastitis and quality of milk on smallholder dairy farms in Tanzania. J S Afr Vet Assoc 80: 163–168
Meshref AMS, Moselhy WA, Hassan NEHY (2015) Aluminium content in milk and milk products and its leachability from dairy utensils. Int J Dairy Sci 10: 236–242. DOI: 10.3923/ijds.2015.236.242
Olivier SP, Jayarao BM, Almeida RA (2005) Foodborne Pathogens in Milk and the Dairy Farm Environment: Food Safety and Public Health Implications. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2: 115–137
Semwal AD, Padmashree A, Khan MA, Sharma GK, Bawa AS (2006) Leaching of aluminium from utensils during cooking of food. J Sci Food Agr. 86: 2425–2430
Singh V, Gupta J (2015) Analysis of knowledge and adoption level of the dairy farmers regarding clean milk production (CMP) practices. Asian J Dairy Food Res 34: 180–186
Singh BB, Kaur R, Gill GS, Gill JPS, Soni RK, Aulakh R S (2019) Knowledge, attitude and practices relating to zoonotic diseases among livestock farmers in Punjab, India. Acta Tropica 189: 15–21
Surkar SH, Sawarkar SW, Kolhe RP, Basunathe VK (2014) Constraints Perceived by Dairy Farmers in Quality Milk Production. Agric Rural Dev 1: 5–7
Vissers MMM, Driehuis F (2009) On-Farm Hygienic Milk Production. In Milk procesing and quality Management (ed Tamime A Y), Blackwell, Oxford,1-22
