Seasonal effect on sexual behaviour of Kankrej bull


549 / 278

Authors

  • Rinku Deka Veterinary college. S.D. Agricultural University Sardarkrushinagar, Banaskantha. Gujarat 385506
  • Jethabhai B Patel Livestock Research Station, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar – 385 506, Gujarat, India
  • Amit Kumar Srivastava Veterinary college. S.D. Agricultural University Sardarkrushinagar, Banaskantha. Gujarat 385506
  • Karshanbhai B Prajapati Livestock Research Station, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar – 385 506, Gujarat, India
  • Jigar H Patel Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Arnej Anand Agricultural University, Anand – 382230, Gujarat, India
  • Bharatsinh S Rathod Livestock Research Station, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar – 385 506, Gujarat, India

Keywords:

Sexual Behaviour, Season, Kankrej, Erection, Protrusion, Libido, Reaction time.

Abstract

A study on sexual behaviour in Kankrej bull was carried out at the Semen Processing Unit; with the objectives to study the seasonal effect on sexual behaviour traits of Kankrej bulls. The period of investigation was divided into three seasons viz., summer, monsoon and winter. Eight apparently healthy Kankrej bulls of 4-5 years of age were selected. For each of the bull, fortnightly observations of semen collection were recorded and total 192 collections, 64 from each season were recorded and evaluated.  The mean values for different sexual behaviour traits were; temperament score (0-5 scale) 1.96±0.02, libido score (0-9 scale) 6.20±0.12, erection score (0-4 scale) 3.36±0.04, protrusion score (0-4 scale) 2.90±0.02, intensity of thrust (0-4 scale) 3.42±0.06, reaction time 112.20±5.09 seconds, total time taken to successful mount 165.68±6.53 seconds and Flehmen reaction (0-1 scale) 0.49±0.04.

Libido was significantly higher in June (7.31±0.35) and July (7.25±0.41) months, compared to rest of the months. Significantly (P<0.05) lower libido was observed in October (5.31±0.45) and November (5.13±0.34) months. Libido score was significantly (P<0.05) higher during summer (6.70±0.18) season compared to winter (5.70±0.19). However, libido score during monsoon (6.20±0.23) was non-significant with both summer and winter seasons. Seasonal variation was comparable for rest of the sexual behaviour traits viz., temperament, erection, protrusion, intensity of thrust, reaction time, total time taken to successful mount and Flehmen reaction. Positive correlation was observed between libido score and reaction time; erection score with protrusion score and intensity of thrust; protrusion score with intensity of thrust and reaction time with total time taken in successful mount.

Author Biographies

  • Rinku Deka, Veterinary college. S.D. Agricultural University Sardarkrushinagar, Banaskantha. Gujarat 385506
    Post Graduate Scholar
  • Jethabhai B Patel, Livestock Research Station, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar – 385 506, Gujarat, India
    Research Scienctist (Livestock)
  • Amit Kumar Srivastava, Veterinary college. S.D. Agricultural University Sardarkrushinagar, Banaskantha. Gujarat 385506

    Assistant Professor Department of LPM

  • Karshanbhai B Prajapati, Livestock Research Station, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar – 385 506, Gujarat, India
    Research Scienctist (Livestock)
  • Jigar H Patel, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Arnej Anand Agricultural University, Anand – 382230, Gujarat, India
    Scientist Animal Science
  • Bharatsinh S Rathod, Livestock Research Station, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar – 385 506, Gujarat, India
    Assistant Professor Department of Obstetrics and

    Obstetrics and Gynecology

Downloads

Submitted

2018-11-25

Published

2019-10-28

Issue

Section

ANIMAL PRODUCTION & REPRODUCTION

How to Cite

Deka, R., Patel, J. B., Srivastava, A. K., Prajapati, K. B., Patel, J. H., & Rathod, B. S. (2019). Seasonal effect on sexual behaviour of Kankrej bull. Indian Journal of Dairy Science, 72(5). https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJDS/article/view/85120