Optimisation of the ingredients for the development of low-calorie basundi
681 / 298
Authors
-
Mayank Singh
NDRI
-
Kaushik Khamrui
-
Writdhama G Prasad
Keywords:
General factorial design, Low-calorie basundi, Sensory attributes, RheologyAbstract
In the present investigation the levels of sucralose (55-75 ppm), a mixture of maltodextrin and D-sorbitol (1:1) (4-6%) and inulin (0.5-1.5%), were optimised using General Factorial Design. The combination resulting in maximum desirability of 0.851 with formulation viz., sucralose (65 ppm), a mixture of maltodextrin and D-sorbitol (5%), and inulin (1.5%) was selected as an optimised solution based on the sensorial, rheological and colour attributes of the product. The scores of quality attributes varied significantly when the level of anyone factor changed to interact with the remaining two factors. An increase in flavour score was observed with an increase in inulin level and a mix of bulking agents while a decrease in varying sucralose from 55 to 65 ppm. The decrease was due to an undesirable medicinal flavour perceived in the product. The interaction among the factors gave the unique value for which no common trend was observed. The sensory scores viz., flavour, colour and appearance, consistency and overall acceptability were 7.70, 7.69, 7.54, 7.64, respectively, and the colour attributes viz., L*, a*, b* value, whiteness and brownness index were 78.21, 1.67, 17.79, 71.79, and 29.85, respectively. The calorie content in optimized basundi was reduced to 130.71 C/100g on comparing with control basundi (189.55 C/100g). The optimised basundi contained 65.30±0.01% moisture, 1.11±0.01% fat, 8.49±0.32% protein, 9.22±0.61% lactose, 10.90±0.12% carbohydrates (maltodextrin), 142.12 ppm sucralose, and 1.49±0.18% ash. The fat content was reduced to 1.11% with the complete eradication of sucrose. Thus, the total calorie value was reduced to 58.84 C/100g. All samples had pseudoplastic flow behaviour with consistency coefficient 14.3±1.30 and 32.6±2.10 mPa.s, respectively.
References
1. Arvind, Singh RP, Pandhi S (2019) Process optimization for development of low-calorie milk cake. Indian J Dairy Sci 72: 138–147
2. Bingham D, Sitter R, Kelly E, Moore L, Olivas JD (2008) Factorial designs with multiple levels of randomisation. Stat Sin 18: 493–513
3. Chattopadhyay S, Raychaudhari U, Chakraborty R (2014) Artificial sweeteners — a review. J Food Sci Technol, 51: 611–621
4. CIE Supplement No. 2 to CIE Publication No. 15 Colourimetry (1971) Recommendations on uniform colour spaces, colour difference equations, psychometric colour terms, Bureau Central de la C.I.E., Paris, 1978
5. DAHD (2019) Basic Animal Husbandry Statistics-2019. Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying. Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Government of India, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi (01/06/2020). Retrieved from http://www.dahd.nic.in/about-us/divisions/statistics
6. DiNicolantonio JJ, Fares H, Niazi, AK, Chatterjee S, D'Ascenzo F, Cerrato E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Lavie CJ, Bell DS, O'Keefe JH (2015) β-Blockers in hypertension, diabetes, heart failure and acute myocardial infarction: a review of the literature. Open Heart 2. DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000230
7. Drake MA (2009) Modern Sensory Practices. In S Clark, M Costello, MA Drake, F Bodyfelt (Eds.), The Sensory Evaluation of Dairy Products (2nd ed., Chapter 17, pp. 520–524), Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA
8. FAO (2020) Dairy Market Review, March 2020. FAO
9. Furlán LTR, Campderrós M (2017) The combined effects of Stevia and sucralose as sugar substitute and inulin as fat mimetic on the physicochemical properties of sugar-free reduced-fat dairy dessert. Int J of Gastron Food Sci 10: 16-23
10. Gaikwad SM, Hembade AS, Landge SN, Chate BN (2015) A comparative study of physicochemical and sensorial properties of Indian desiccated dairy product Ujani Basundi and Basundi. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 4: 164–167
11. Henika RG (1982) Use of response surface methodology in sensory evaluation. Food Technol 36: 96–101
12. Indrasinh RG, Khamrui K, Devraja HC, Surajit M (2015) Effect of different ingredient levels on an instrumental colour characteristic of dietetic Peda. Research & Reviews: J Dairy Sci and Technol 3: 1–10
13. Khedkar CD, Kalyankar SD, Deosarkar SS (2016) Buffalo milk. In Caballero B, Finglas P, Toldrá F (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of Food and Health: (vol. 1, pp. 522–528). Oxford: Academic Press
14. Lordan R, Tsoupras A, Mitra B, Zabetakis I (2018) Dairy Fats and Cardiovascular Disease: Do We Really Need to Be Concerned? Foods 7: 1–34. DOI: 10.3390/foods7030029
15. Luukkonen et al (2018) Saturated fat is more metabolically harmful to the human liver than unsaturated fat or simple sugars. Diabetes Care 41: 1732–1739. DOI: 10.2337/dc18-0071
16. Mahmood A, Al-Juboori S (2020) A Review: Saccharin Discovery, Synthesis, and Applications. Ibn AL- Haitham J Pure Appl Sci 33: 43–61
17. Montagenese C, Santarpia L, Iavarone F, Strangio F, Sangiovanni B, Buonifacio et al (2019). Food-Based dietary guidelines around the World: Eastern Mediterranean and Middle Eastern Countries. Nutrients 1: 1325. DOI: 10.3390/nu11061325
18. Moore DA, Sischo WM, Taylor J, Hartman, ML (2009) Quality assessments of waste milk at a calf ranch. J Dairy Sci 92: 3503–3509
19. NIN (2011) Dietary guidelines for Indians – A Manual, National Institute of Nutrition, Indian Council of Medical Research, Hyderabad-500007, India
20. Ostertagová E, Ostertag O (2013) Methodology and application of one-way ANOVA. Am J Mech Eng 1: 256–261
21. Parmar P, Singh AK, Gupta VK, Borad S, Raju PN (2018) Effect of packaging material on shelf-life of Basundi manufactured using Ohmic heating. Indian J Dairy Sci 71: 215–222
22. Patel HG, Upadhyay KG (2003) Standardisation of the compositional recipe of Basundi — level of total solids concentration, Fat: SNF ratio and type of Milk. J Food Sci Technol: 40, 476–481
23. Patil GR (2013) Current scenario, scope and challenges of traditional Indian dairy products. In Souvenir of national training on advances in production, functional, rheological and quality aspects of traditional Indian dairy products (pp. 1–11), 8–28 October 2013. Karnal, India
24. Rao JR, Pagote CN (2018) Use of artificial sweeteners in Indian traditional dairy products. Food Nutr J 39: 1-9
25. Rasane P, Tanwar B, Dey A (2015) Khoa: A heat desiccated indigenous Indian dairy product. Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci 6: 39–48
26. Rathod GI, Khamrui K (2015) Instrumental texture profile of reduced-calorie peda as a function of ingredients using response surface methodology. Int J Dairy Technol 68: 543–549
27. RodrÃguez-GarcÃa J, Salvador A, Puig A, Isabel H (2014) Replacing Fat and Sugar with Inulin in Cakes: Bubble Size Distribution, Physical and Sensory Properties. Food Bioproc Tech 77: 189-97
28. Sen GA (2016) Application of full factorial experimental design and response surface methodology for chromite beneficiation by Knelson concentrator. Minerals 6: 1–11
29. Sinaga H, Bansal N, Bhandari B (2017) Effects of milk pH alteration on casein micelle size and gelation properties of milk. Int J Food Prop 20: 179–197
30. Sindhu JS (1999) Physico-chemical properties of cow and buffalo milk to milk processing. In Advances in processing and preservation of milk: A compendium of short-term course notes. Karnal, Haryana: National Dairy Research Institute
31. Singh M, Kumar B, Minz P, Singh G (2018) Effect of process parameters on colour attributes of Rice Kheer produced using the mechanised system. Indian J Dairy Sci 71: 330–337
32. Smith G (Ed.) (2015) Multiple Regression. In Essential Statistics, Regression, and Econometrics (2nd ed., pp. 301–337). Academic Press. DOI:10.1016/b978-0-12-803459-0.00010-8
33. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (Eds.) (1994) Statistical methods (8th ed., Chapter 5, pp. 105–125). Calcutta, India: Oxford and IBH Publishing Company
34. Suhail R, Geetha T, Broderick TL, Babu JR (2018) High fat with high sucrose diet leads to obesity and induces myodegeneration. Front Physiol 9: 1054. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01054
35. USDA (2020) Scientific Report of 2020. Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee: Advisory Report to the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Secretary of Agriculture, 2020–2025. 9th Edition
36. December 2020. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, DC
