Effect of Feeding Slow Release Non Protein Nitrogen Sources on Performance of Dairy Cows
345 / 176
Keywords:
Dairy cow, slow release urea, milk yield, milk composition, cost economicsAbstract
A study of 90 days duration was conducted on 18 multiparous crossbred cows (363±14kg, body weight; in II or III lactation; 3,000-4,500kg milk yield per lactation) randomly allotted to 3 dietary treatments with 6 animals in each group in a completely randomized design to investigate the effect of two slow release non protein nitrogen (SRNPN) products on feed intake, milk yield, milk composition, blood biochemical parameters and cost economics. The concentrate mixture for control group was formulated with maize, gram husk, ground nut cake, wheat bran, deoiled rice bran, salt and mineral mixture. The other two experimental concentrate mixtures were prepared by totally replacing ground nut cake with calcium salts of fatty acid coated urea (CFCU) and Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose coated urea (HMCCU) at 2.42%. The cows were offered fixed quantity of Napier green fodder (10kg/cow/day) and ad libitum paddy straw. The daily allowance of respective concentrate mixture offered to each cow was calculated based on body weight, previous week milk yield and roughage intake to meet the nutrient requirements of as per ICAR (2013). Incorporation of either of the coated urea products in concentrate mixtures did not affect the total DM intake, milk yield (13.94 to 14.11kg/d), milk composition (Milk fat, Protein, SNF and Lactose) and blood biochemical (Blood urea nitrogen, Glucose and total protein). Though non significant, the average daily cost of feeding (Rs/d) was lowered in CFCU (228.14) and HMCCU (215.98) diet fed cows compared to control group cows (237.08) by 3.77 and 8.89% respectively. Whereas, the cost of feeding (Rs) per kg milk production differed significantly (P<0.01) with highest in control diet fed group (16.80) while in CFCU (15.43) and HMCCU (15.49) fed group it was lower. CFCU and HMCCU can be included at 1% of dry matter or 2.42% in the concentrate replacing the conventional protein sources, without affecting the milk yield and its composition in cross bred cows and reducing the feed cost per kg milk production.
References
Abreu, R.P., Lana, A.S., Oliveira, F.A., Barbosa, F.L., Andrade, P.T., Silva, M.A., Fonseca, C.P., Ghedini, R.M., Paula. and Magalhaes, F.A. 2014. Performance of lactating crossbred cows on pasture supplemented with conventional urea or slow release urea. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science, 66: 1487-1494.
AOAC (2016) Association of official analytical chemists international official methods of analysis. 16th Edition, AOAC, Arlington.
Bartley, E.E. and Deyoe, C.W. 1975. Starea as a protein replacer for ruminants. A review of 10 years of research. Feedstuffs,47: 42–51.
Bector, B. S., Ram, M. and Singhal, O.P. Rapid platform test for the detection/determination of added urea in milk. Animal nutrition and feed technology.20(1): 155.
Broderick, G. A. and S. M. Reynal. 2006. Effect of varying dietary ratios of alfalfa silage to corn silage on omasal flow and microbial protein synthesis in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 89:3939–3953.
Calomeni GD, Gardinal R., &Venturelli BC. 2015. Effects of polymer-coated slow-release urea on performance, ruminal fermentation, and blood metabolites in dairy cows. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 44:327–34.
Cherdthong A, Wanapat M. 2013. Development of urea products as rumen slow-release feed for ruminant production: a review. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 4(8):2232–41.
Cherdthong A, Wanapat M., and Wachipakorn C. 2011. Effects of urea-calcium mixture in concentrate containing high cassava chip on feed intake, rumen fermentation and performance of lactating dairy cows fed on rice straw. Livestock Science, 136:76–84.
Dhali, A. 2001. Studies on the effect of feeding management systems on blood and milk urea concentration in dairy cattle. Ph.D. thesis. National Dairy Research Institute (Deemed University), Karnal, India.
Duncan D. B., 1955. Multiple range and multiple F-tests. Biometrics, 11, 1-42.
Forero, O., Owens, F.N. and Lusby, K.S. 1980. Evaluation of slow-release urea for winter supplementation of lactating range cows. Journal of Animal science, 50: 532–538.
Galo, E., Emanuele.S.M., Sniffen.C. J., White, J.H. and Knapp, J. R. 2003. Effects of a polymer-coated urea product on nitrogen metabolism in lactating Holstein dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 86: 2154–2162.
Gardinal, R., Calomeni, G. D. Consolo, N. R. B., Takiya, C. S., Freitas Jr, J. E., Gandra, J. R., Vendramini, T. H. A., Souza, H. N. and Renno. F. P. 2017. Influence of polymer-coated slow-release urea on total tract apparent digestibility, ruminal fermentation and performance of Nellore steers. Asian-Australasia Journal of Animal Science, 30:34-41.
Golombeski, G. L., Kalscheur, K. F., Hippen, A. R., and Schingoethe, D. J. 2006. Slow-Release Urea and Highly Fermentable Sugars in Diets Fed to Lactating Dairy Cows. Journal of Dairy science,89: 4395-4403.
Goncalves, A.P., Carolina Fernanda., Rodrigo da Costa Gomes., Marcelo de Queiroz., Carolina Tobias Marino and Paulo Henrique Mazza Rodrigues. 2015. Slow-release Urea in Supplement Fed to Beef Steers. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology,58(1): 22-30.
Highstreet, A., Robinson, P.H., Robinson, J. and Garret, J.G. 2010. Response of Holstein cows to replacing urea with a slowly rumen released urea in a diet high in soluble crude protein. Livestock Science,129: 179-85.
ICAR. 2013. Nutrient Requirements of Sheep, Goat and Rabbit. IndianCouncil of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.
Inostroza , J.F., Shaver, R.D., PAS, V.E., Cabrera.Hand Tricarico, J.M.E. 2010. Effect of diets containing a controlled-release urea product on milk yield, milk composition, and milk component yields in commercial wisconsin dairy herds and economic implications. The Professional Animal Scientist,26:175–180.
Kertz, A. F. 2010. Review: Urea Feeding to Dairy Cattle: A Historical Perspective and Review. The Professional Animal Scientist, 26: 257-272.
Lapierre, H., Lobley, G.E. 2007. Nitrogen recycling in the ruminant: a review.Journal of Dairy Science., v.84,: E223-E236, .
Loest, C.A., Titgemeyer E.C. And Drouillard J.S. 2001. Urea and biuret as nonprotein nitrogen sources in cooked molasses blocks for steers fed prairie hay. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., v.94, p.115-126.
Muhammad Irfan Khan, Saeed Ahmed, Abdur Rahman, Fayyaz Ahmad and Anjum Khalique. 2015. Comparative Efficacy of urea and slow-release non-protein nitrogen on performance of Nili-Ravi buffalo calves. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 47(4): 1097-1102.
Neto, J.G., dos Santos Pedreira, M., de Oliveira Silva, H.G., Alves, E.M., dos Santos, E.D. J., da Silva, A.C., Perazzo, A.F. and Correa, Y.R. 2017. Types of urea and carbohydrate sources in diets of lambs: microbial protein synthesis and nitrogen balance. Revista Electrónica de Veterinaria,18(9): 1-15.
NRC, 2001- Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 2001. Seventh Revised Edition.
Oltner, R. and H. Wiktorsson. 1983. Urea concentration in milk and blood as influenced by feeding varying amounts of protein and energy to dairy cows. Livest. Prod. Sci. 10:457-467
Prokop, M.J. and Klopfenstein, T.J. 1977. Slow ammonia release urea. Nebraska Beef Cattle Report Nebraska No. EC. 77-218
Raouf, A. E., Bassiouni, M. M. I., Ali, M. F. and Hassanien, H. E. 2017. Effect of using slow-release urea on milk production and its composition of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Sciences,43: 17 – 26.
Ribeiro, S.S. Vasconcelos, M.G. Morais, C.B. Itavoa, C.F. and Francoa. G.L. 2011. Effects of ruminal infusion of a slow-release polymer-coated urea or conventional urea on apparent nutrient digestibility, in situ degradability, and rumen parameters in cattle fed low-quality hay. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 164:53–61.
Ropstad, E., L. Vik-Mo and A. O. Refsdal. 1989. Levels of milk urea, plasma constituents and rumen liquid ammonia in relation to the feeding of dairy cows during early lactation. Acta Vet. Sacnd. 39:199-208.
Santiago BT, Villela SDJ, Leonel FP., 2015. Slow-release urea in diets for lactating crossbred cows. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 44:193-9.
Santos, G. T., Cavalieri, F. L. B. and Modesto, E. C. 2001. Recentes avanços em nitrogênio não proteico na nutrição de vacas leiteiras. p.199-228. In: Anais do 2o Simpósio Internacional em Bovinocultura de Leite: Novos Conceitos em Nutrição. UFLA, Lavras.
Sinclair, L.A., Huntington, J.A. and Wilde, D. 2008. Partial replacement of soyabean meal and rapeseed meal with a slow release urea source (Optigen) and its effect on microbial growth and metabolism in vitro. Scarborough, UK: British Society of Animal Science. Annual Meeting: p. 228.
Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. 1980. Statistical Methods. Oxford and IBH. Publishing Company, New Delhi.
Souza, J., Preseault, C.L. and Lock, A.L. 2010. Altering the ratio of dietary palmitic, stearic, and oleic acids in diets with or without whole cottonseed affects nutrient digestibility, energy partitioning, and production responses of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science,101: 172–185.
Sorathiyai, L.M. and Fulsoundar, A.B. 2011. Effect of urea-molasses supplementation on growth, economics and blood biochemical parameters in buffalo heifers. lndian Journal of Animal Production and Management, 28(1-2): 68-70.
SPSS. 1995. Statistical Package for the Social Science,Inc. Chicago.
Taylor-Edwards, C. C., Hibbard, G.,Kitts, S. E. 2009. Effects of slow-release urea on ruminal digesta characteristics and growth performance in beef steers. Journal of Animal Science. 87:200-8.
Varlyakov, I., Radev, V., Slavov, T., Uzunova, K., Mihaylov, R. and Toshevska, M. 2011. Changes in blood biochemical indices in yerling rams after dietary supplementation of optigen. Albanian Journal of Agricultural Science, 14: 19-24.
Xin, H.S., Schaefer, D.M., Liu, Q.P., Axe, D.E. and Meng, Q.X., 2010. Effects of polyurethane coated urea supplement on in vitro ruminal fermentation, ammonia release dynamics and lactating performance of Holstein dairy cows fed a steam flaked corn-based diet. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science. 23: 491–500.